[HP4GU-FAQ] Scabbers

[Penny Linsenmayer]

Hi --

<<<As a rule, I'm assuming we should cover things in depth in one place, and 
add a link to the most relevant FAQ in other places, but we'll need to check 
that the item in question has been covered in depth in that FAQ.  For 
example, I might mention Quidditch balls under Magical Devices, but refer 
readers to Quidditch for more detailed coverage.  In that case, I'm doing 
both FAQs, but if I wasn't, I might have to check that the other FAq-er 
wasn't making a similar assumption in the opposite direction.  Make 
sense?>>>

Yes, definitely makes sense & I agree completely.  I'm sure I'll be posting 
a number of these type questions today and tomorrow as I work on the FAQs.  
Unless anyone objects, I think posting those questions here is better than 
posting them individually since a topic might well be covered to some extent 
in 3-4 FAQs being written by 3-4 different people.  Does *that* make sense?  
<g>

Penny



>From: Neil Ward <neilward at dircon.co.uk>
>Reply-To: HP4GU-FAQ at egroups.com
>To: HP4GU-FAQ at egroups.com
>Subject: Re: [HP4GU-FAQ] Scabbers
>Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 05:01:30 +0100
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Neil Ward <neilward at dircon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [HP4GU-FAQ] Scabbers
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 05:01:30 +0100
Size: 3033
URL: <http://archive.hpfgu.org/pipermail/hp4gu-faq/attachments/20000915/2285d9ed/attachment.mht>