Comments on the Geography FAQ :)

[heidi.h.tandy.c92 at alumni.upenn.edu]

--- In HP4GU-FAQ at egroups.com, Penny & Bryce Linsenmayer 
<pennylin at s...> wrote:
> Hi --
> 
> John -- great comments on the Burrow issue.  My personal opinion is 
that
> maybe you should post an actual message to the group with this 
info, so
> that there can be a message citation in the Burrow section.  But, 
maybe
> others won't think that's necessary.
I actually had already made some changes to this portion of the faq - 
we had a thread about this back in I think November, when I peeped up 
about the cab ride I once took from London to Southhampton which was 
cheaper, for 4 of us, than train tickets bought at the last minute 
would be. But the more cites, the better, 

Steve - it was such a thrill to see the faq up there - and I love the 
way it looks.
I do think, however, that even though it's not much use in court, a 
disclaimer along with the copyright & UPDATE notes would be a good 
idea - Penny? what do you think? 


> What do we think?  Can we as a group just edit the FAQs of others 
based
> on our own substantive knowledge & not really worry about creating a
> message to the group with that info?  Either way is fine by me .... 
just
> a thought (since we have message #s for support for info).  Or, at 
least
> all my info is supported by footnotes with message #s or page 
references
> (or interviews, articles, etc.).

I do a lot of refs to websites, articles, interviews, etc., which 
were never discussed extensively on the list, and I think that's a 
fine replacement for actual message cites. I'm also not listing EVERY 
message which refers to a topic - the lists become prohibitavely 
long - I'm only citing to those I actually use in compiling the FAQ 
itself, either as quote or as inspiration - is that ok?
> >