[HP4GU-FAQ] A couple of questions

[Neil Ward]

Mike said:

> (2) There seem to be several different ways of documenting one's FAQ.
Penny
> has lovely footnotes that conform to everything I can remember forgetting
in
> my Chicago Manual. Other people have integrated references into their
texts.
> Yet other people have used footnotes but added hyperlinks to principle
> egroups discussions. Should I be emulating any one of these styles or just
> doing whatever I feel like?

I'd agree with Steve on this.  We've all taken slightly different approaches
(I think I've been the least observant of footnotes and annotations, for
example, although I'll probably add some in later) and even different
approaches with different types of FAQ.

It's a bit like the weekly summaries - every one is slightly different in
style to the next, but we can live with that.

> I can *guarantee* having my FAQ's ready to upload in four weeks. Depending
> on my ... err ... day job, I may have them ready sooner. If it's important
> to have *one* of them up sooner, I'll be glad to oblige.

That will put me to shame...

Neil