[HP4GU-FAQ] Re: FAQs - more musings

[Tandy, Heidi]

I still think we should have a movie FAQ, but perhaps it should be about a
page long, and say:
 
"There have been many casting discussions, which still continue on
HP4GU-OTCHATTER (link)"
You can find out more about the movies at :
HP Galleries
Ain't It Cool News
Countingdown
Empire Online and
the Warner Bros site
 
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Penny & Bryce Linsenmayer [mailto:pennylin at swbell.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 11:26 PM
To: HP4GU-FAQ at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [HP4GU-FAQ] Re: FAQs - more musings


Hi again -- 

Neil Ward wrote: 


The Casting FAQ is really a Movie FAQ.  To be honest, trawling 
through a pile of "Colin Firth is the perfect tottie for Sirius" is 
no longer on my agenda, and most of the rest is, arguably, factual 
information about the movie that is available elsewhere.  I think 
this is one FAQ that I would gladly hold up to the moon, in the hope 
that the fairies would carry it off during the night.

Well, when you put it like that ... <g>  Perhaps we should not have a movie
FAQ.  It may make sense to eliminate it if we are going to end up with even
a temporary sister group for movie discussions.  BTW, thanks for remembering
to check on that poll.  I'm glad that you asked people to vote as it was
running neck & neck as they say.  I'm disappointed to just now notice that
voting has pulled away in favor of leaving discussions on the main list.
<g>  Although, isn't there a plurality that favor moving it and the
difference being whether it's a temporary or permanent move?  [Gee, can you
tell how I voted?] 

Um...who offered to do Neville Longbottom?

Mike not only offered, he's finished it.  It's uploaded already. 

TO REVISIT AN OLD TOPIC: you remember that we discussed the possibility of
making the FAQs into a book, with proceeds going to charity?  I can't for
the life of me think why anyone would want to *buy* it in printed form when
all they'd need to do is go to the FAQ website.  BUT, it does gall me to see
the spate of books that now seem to be coming on the market, and our
information is SO much better & more complete.  I just read David Colbert's
"The Magical Worlds of Harry Potter."  While it is tons better than the
Schaefer book, it's not nearly so good as our information.  For example, he
seems to be confused about the Goblet of Fire -- he thinks it's the same
thing as the Triwizard Cup.  [It's *not* is it?  <g>  Now, I'm doubting
myself since it's reasonably late here & I don't have my copy handy].
Anyway .... any thoughts on this old topic?  Amazing the number of things
that you can dream up while spending literally hours of every day nursing &
rocking a baby ... 


Penny 
  
  


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor	
 
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=210156.1528655.3092753.1456763/D=egroupweb/S=17075441
08:HM/A=735622/R=0/*https://www.literaryguild.com/mybookclub/halfoff/bookclu
bs/lga/JoinFast/c31/c31_coupon.htm/?src=015_02_hu_273_002_2686> 	
 
<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=210156.1528655.3092753.1456763/D=egroupmai
l/S=1707544108:HM/A=735622/rand=625301406> 	

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
HP4GU-FAQ-unsubscribe at egroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .