Still More cataloguing questions

[lucky_kari]

--- In HP4GU-FAQ at y..., eloiseherisson at a... wrote:

> That was kind of what I was concerned about and why I was using
additional 
> separate entries.
> 
> > <>Eileen:
> > 
> > >How about using a dash to indicate non-shipping
> > > rleationships. Therefore, it would be Snape-Lily vs. Snape/Lily. 
> > 
> > I dunno.  This gets to be a lot to remember. 
> 
> I agree.

I agree now too. :-)

> 
> 
>  If I had a LOLLIPOPS > 
> > Snape/Lily post, I'd catalogue it as SHIP, LOLLIPOPS, Snape/Lily.  
> 
> But doesn't this pose exactly the same problem that a sort will put
that post 
> with Snape only and not with Lily, for someone working on a Lily FAQ?

Well, yes it does, come to think of it. Perhaps we should only use
slashes with the four biggies on the list: R/Hr, H/Hr, D/Hr, and H/G.
These are discussed all the time and anyone writing a FAQ on Ron,
Harry, Hermione, Draco, or Ginny should know enough to look these up.

I am going to go nuts having to write Keyword 1: SHIP Keyword 2: Ron
Keyword 3: Harry Keyword 4: Hermione, Keyword 5: Ginny, Keyword 6:
OBHWF, Keyword 7etc: whatever the post addresses in relation to OBHWF
for simple posts about OBHWF.

Eileen, just having got to a Snape/Sirius war. Very fun writing
comments. "Sirius was a teenager! Snape is now immature!" etc.