Harry FP and Leadership

[Ali]

Cindy asked:

>>> I wonder if we can agree that we won't upload any FPs that do not
 address OoP?  I really think that if we upload anything that doesn't
 reflect OoP discussion that the reaction from our membership will 
not be positive.>>>

Ali:

In an ideal world, all the FPs should be updated to include OoP. I'm 
sure that's what our membership would want. However, wouldn't they 
rather have an FP which clearly states what it is includes and the 
expectation that it will be updated rather than no FP at all?

It's still only a few months since OoP was released, and I don't 
feel that I'm wrong in thinking that the OoP section of the 
Quidditch FP would loose out by waiting a few more months for more 
posts on the subject. In a way, we have a bit of a conundrum; the 
FPs are designed to reflect the posts of our membership, There have 
been some Quidditch posts, and if people have message numbers I'll 
happily look at them, but my intention is to concentrate on where 
the bulk of the discussion has been - and that's pre-OoP. I have the 
not unreasonable expectation that quality posts will continue to 
filter in. At that point, the OoP discussion update would include 
these posts.

If this idea is unacceptable to the group, then, I'll finish the FP 
as I'd intended, and we can either then keep it on file until I 
update next year, or somebody else can take it over. 

Ali