GRYFFINDOR: Whither the Weasleys?

[charisjulia]

>>>>>>I've been thinking about how to do this and it seems to me that 
our
general approach would be:

1. General Weasley Stuff
2. Members of the family<<<<<<

Sounds good to me!

>>>>>>>>>>While we'll be searching the catalogue, it occurs to me 
that it might
be worthwhile to start by identifying important posts/threads that we
already know exist. For example, Elkins's Twins thread, Debbie's
analysis of Percy as Mr. Crouch's faithful son etc. In this vein, I
have in mind a post from last summer about Bill's relationship to
Percy and Ron that was absolutely mind-blowing. Who was the author?
Penny?... I'll have to see about that.<<<<<<<<<

Ooh, I remember that post! It left me staring at it in wonderment. 
Truly magnificent. The author was Debbie and the message number 38730.

But, yes, I agree, a bit of brainstorming would be a good way to get 
going. Which reminds me, I wanted to ask what is in effect the 
opposite of Tom's question on HypotheticAlley: Do all TBAY posts 
automatically belong there? Could we, say, add Imperious!Arthur and 
Auror!Arthur to the Weasley FP ('cos if we can I think we should) or 
must we confine ourselves to those hyperlinking thrills? 

Other than that I haven't really come across any fantastic Weasley 
posts lately (fancy that). I'll scan my lists and catalogues and see 
what I can come up with from older posts.

>>>>>>>>>>>What about Ron, btw? He has his own FP, but are there any 
updates
planned for it? Should we include Ron issues in our FP if not?<<<<<<<<

Well, would it really be possible to construct a Weasley FP and leave 
Ron out?? And on the other hand, messing with Neil's FP wouldn't 
really be our call, would it? So, yeah, I think that would indeed 
probably be the best idea, Eileen: Add whatever new element the 
existing FP has not registered and refer people back to it for 
everything it's covered. 

BTW, has the group as a whole come to any conclusion on how we're 
going to tackle the incorporation of the new FPs to the existing body 
of work? Are going to go for the pre- and post-OoP divide in the end 
or simply start adding and updating? My general impression was that 
we were leaning towards the latter, no?

Charis Julia