<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Hi --
<p>"Simon J. Branford" wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE><tt>I uploaded a file with all the relevant message
numbers for the chapter discussion starts earlier and, in a fit of organization,
remembered to leave room for the remaining chapters in the table.</tt></blockquote>
BTW, thanks Simon! That's great.
<blockquote TYPE=CITE><tt>Neil wrote: "The FAQs would start with a brief
character study followed by the Q&A section and some quotes, while
the character summary for the board would be longer. I guess it depends
on how you view it though."</tt>
<p><tt>Did we decide to go with the FAQ including a small character summary,
which changes to a link to the relevant character discussion message when
the character has been discussed or are the FAQ's to include an in depth</tt>
<br><tt>discussion of the character (i.e. doing the character discussions
for</tt>
<br><tt>characters not yet discussed). I would prefer the first option,
as it is</tt>
<br><tt>less work to do (having said that most of my characters have already
been</tt>
<br><tt>discussed so I would have little else to do).</tt></blockquote>
Aaggh. *Now* I understand the dilemna. I was the one earlier
arguing that the FAQ should be the more complete discussion. But
see, my only character FAQ is also the character I'm summarizing for the
chapter/character discussions. That's why I was thinking, oh, I'll
just write up the Hermione FAQ & then I'll summarize it for the character
discussion later. But, of course, for those of you doing FAQs on
characters who haven't been discussed yet -- Yes! By all means, just
leave a link to the later character discussion & leave the really in-depth
reviews to whoever volunteered to do them. That makes infinitely
more sense. Sorry for the confusion.
<blockquote TYPE=CITE><tt>My weekend provided little free time - something
to do with being away.</tt></blockquote>
Hope you had a great time Simon! And, I hope Neil had a nice holiday
in Madrid.
<p>Penny
<br></html>