From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Sun Apr 4 08:44:22 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 08:44:22 -0000 Subject: UPDATE: Sunday, 4th April Message-ID: Hi The catalogue website powers forward. Paul has now linked the categories list with the coding screen. Some fine tuning and display work is now in progress, but we are seriously getting there. Bet you can't wait ! Carolyn Very tired and muddy from an entire spring weekend spent in the garden.. From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Sun Apr 11 12:23:00 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 12:23:00 -0000 Subject: UPDATE, Easter Sunday, 11th April Message-ID: Great progress. The site is working to the extent that I have been able to categorise the first 500 posts from the old Yahoo club. Paul and I are just sorting out some details of how it all works, and then I will be emailing and posting to you the instructions for how we get going. Carolyn Mistakenly excited at the prospect of categorising 100 000 posts, and going to get in more essential supplies of chocolate eggs. From annemehr at yahoo.com Mon Apr 12 19:31:06 2004 From: annemehr at yahoo.com (annemehr) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 19:31:06 -0000 Subject: UPDATE, Easter Sunday, 11th April In-Reply-To: Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "a_reader2003" wrote: > Great progress. The site is working to the extent that I have been > able to categorise the first 500 posts from the old Yahoo club. Paul > and I are just sorting out some details of how it all works, and then > I will be emailing and posting to you the instructions for how we get > going. > > Carolyn > Mistakenly excited at the prospect of categorising 100 000 posts, and > going to get in more essential supplies of chocolate eggs. Great! But...chocolate eggs? *Much* too difficult to peel and eat while working at a computer! One nice solid chocolate bunny would probably be better... Anne who figures the three "bulk" mailings that showed up over the weekend with dire-looking subject lines and identically-sized 41k attachments are *yet another* virus, but couldn't find out what ones they were... From paul-groups at wibbles.org Sun Apr 18 06:07:02 2004 From: paul-groups at wibbles.org (kippesp) Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 06:07:02 -0000 Subject: British or American spellings Message-ID: I think I know the answer I'll get, but I'll ask anyway. In the web application we have so far, I've used American spellings for things (categorize rather than categorise). Might as well settle on one way or the other. From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Sun Apr 18 09:02:54 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 10:02:54 +0100 Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] British or American spellings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2DD41F52-9117-11D8-AE99-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> > I think I know the answer I'll get, but I'll ask anyway. > > In the web application we have so far, I've used American spellings > for things (categorize rather than categorise). > > Might as well settle on one way or the other. Color? Grey? Gotten? Arrgghh! I suspect the malign influence of Spellcheckers cobbled together somewhere in the vicinity of Seattle. And personally I hate the proclivity of turning nouns into verbs by adding -ise anyway. Going a step further by using -ize in an effort to contemporize or even universalize the constitutionalization of word construction induces feelings of martyrization. (Yet another word this damn machine considers an adjunct to civilization as it sees it. ) I must go and lie down in a darkened room. Barry > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > > ADVERTISEMENT > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > ? To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPFGU-Catalogue/ > ? > ? To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > HPFGU-Catalogue-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com > ? > ? Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service. > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 1724 bytes Desc: not available URL: From annemehr at yahoo.com Sun Apr 18 14:38:56 2004 From: annemehr at yahoo.com (annemehr) Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 14:38:56 -0000 Subject: British or American spellings In-Reply-To: <2DD41F52-9117-11D8-AE99-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > > > > > I think I know the answer I'll get, but I'll ask anyway. > > > > In the web application we have so far, I've used American spellings > > for things (categorize rather than categorise). > > > > Might as well settle on one way or the other. > > > Color? > Grey? > Gotten? > > Arrgghh! > > I suspect the malign influence of Spellcheckers cobbled together > somewhere in the vicinity of Seattle. And personally I hate the > proclivity of turning nouns into verbs by adding -ise anyway. Going a > step further by using -ize in an effort to contemporize or even > universalize the constitutionalization of word construction induces > feelings of martyrization. (Yet another word this damn machine > considers an adjunct to civilization as it sees it. ) > > I must go and lie down in a darkened room. > > Barry Poor dear! Hey, I can Britspell. Turns out, I normally write -ise anyway, think "as well" works better than "too," and my spellchecker prefers "gray" (not that I ever use it). It won't kill me to start writing in colour. Besides, I worry for Barry because I'm sure there will be a certain amount of butterflies and rose-colour at the end of book seven. ;-) Anne From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Sun Apr 18 21:22:23 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:22:23 -0000 Subject: British or American spellings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "annemehr" wrote: > --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I think I know the answer I'll get, but I'll ask anyway. > > > > > > In the web application we have so far, I've used American spellings > > > for things (categorize rather than categorise). > > > > > > Might as well settle on one way or the other. > > > > > > Color? > > Grey? > > Gotten? > > > > Arrgghh! > > > > I suspect the malign influence of Spellcheckers cobbled together > > somewhere in the vicinity of Seattle. And personally I hate the > > proclivity of turning nouns into verbs by adding -ise anyway. Going a > > step further by using -ize in an effort to contemporize or even > > universalize the constitutionalization of word construction induces > > feelings of martyrization. (Yet another word this damn machine > > considers an adjunct to civilization as it sees it. ) > > > > I must go and lie down in a darkened room. > > > > Barry > > Poor dear! > > Hey, I can Britspell. Turns out, I normally write -ise anyway, think > "as well" works better than "too," and my spellchecker prefers "gray" > (not that I ever use it). It won't kill me to start writing in colour. > > Besides, I worry for Barry because I'm sure there will be a certain > amount of butterflies and rose-colour at the end of book seven. ;-) > > Anne Hah ! Our first major hurdle. The list is 70-80% US members I seem to remember.. but, dare I say it, because the books are British, we should try and use Brit spelling ?? Think of it as a homage to JKR... Hum, as for Barry, a listie found him out months ago - a soft spot for Molly I believe, furiously denied of course ! (ducks and runs..) Carolyn From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Sun Apr 18 21:32:45 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:32:45 -0000 Subject: UPDATE Sunday 18th April: We're in business Message-ID: Great news, we have got the site just about working. I have uploaded a file called 'Cataloguing Site Notes' which gives full instructions. Please take a look... Paul has done a great job in carrying out the basic specification, which was 'No tech stuff'. What we have ended up with is a site anyone can access through their current browser, and you don't have to learn any weird new programmes, just begin right away categorising posts. The site will continue to be developed in all sorts of ways whilst we get on with the work, but personally I am just so pleased to have got this far: thank you Paul. Ok, there are bound to be a million questions, so lets be hearing from you. Cheers Carolyn From dicentra at xmission.com Tue Apr 20 18:56:56 2004 From: dicentra at xmission.com (Dicentra spectabilis) Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:56:56 -0000 Subject: British or American spellings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "a_reader2003" wrote: > Hah ! Our first major hurdle. The list is 70-80% US members I seem to > remember.. but, dare I say it, because the books are British, we > should try and use Brit spelling ?? Think of it as a homage to JKR... I vote for British spelling *and* punctuation. It *is* the convention that JKR uses when she writes, after all. Despite the overwhelming US majority on the lists, it would do us Yanks a bit of good to abide by another set of conventions instead of having everything translated for us. --Dicentra, who thought Barry's analysis was a hootenizer From paul-groups at wibbles.org Thu Apr 22 04:10:18 2004 From: paul-groups at wibbles.org (kippesp) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 04:10:18 -0000 Subject: Accessing catalog site Message-ID: Be sure that you attempt to browse to http://24.0.225.196:8888 either just before or just after emailing me for the site username and password. I'm not suppose to be running a public web server. This will allow me to let your IP address through my firewall and still not violate my TOS. Also, is someone here in Atlanta, GA (and/or using DSL from BellSouth)? Your IP address should get in fine. From annemehr at yahoo.com Thu Apr 22 14:27:20 2004 From: annemehr at yahoo.com (annemehr) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:27:20 -0000 Subject: Accessing catalog site -- Problem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I'm in Pittsburgh PA, using DSL from (I think) Verizon. I can't get past your firewall. Anne --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "kippesp" wrote: > Be sure that you attempt to browse to http://24.0.225.196:8888 > either just before or just after emailing me for the site username > and password. > > I'm not suppose to be running a public web server. This will allow > me to let your IP address through my firewall and still not violate > my TOS. > > Also, is someone here in Atlanta, GA (and/or using DSL from > BellSouth)? Your IP address should get in fine. From paul-groups at wibbles.org Thu Apr 22 20:22:04 2004 From: paul-groups at wibbles.org (Paul Kippes) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: {groups} [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: Accessing catalog site -- Problem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040422202204.82141.qmail@web13807.mail.yahoo.com> Found ya! --- annemehr wrote: --------------------------------- I'm in Pittsburgh PA, using DSL from (I think) Verizon. I can't get past your firewall. Anne --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "kippesp" wrote: > Be sure that you attempt to browse to http://24.0.225.196:8888 > either just before or just after emailing me for the site username > and password. > > I'm not suppose to be running a public web server. This will allow > me to let your IP address through my firewall and still not violate > my TOS. > > Also, is someone here in Atlanta, GA (and/or using DSL from > BellSouth)? Your IP address should get in fine. --------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPFGU-Catalogue/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: HPFGU-Catalogue-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25 http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash From dicentra at xmission.com Sat Apr 24 07:45:56 2004 From: dicentra at xmission.com (Dicentra spectabilis) Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 07:45:56 -0000 Subject: UPDATE Sunday 18th April: We're in business In-Reply-To: Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "a_reader2003" wrote: > > Ok, there are bound to be a million questions, so lets be hearing > from you. Uh, sure you want this? I don't have a million, but... 1) Should we add a text field wherein the cataloguer can add a comment if desired, such as "includes minute-by-minute breakdown of Shrieking Shack scene." This would aid the FAQers tremendously. 2) I noticed that most of the Inish Alley acronyms have been made categories. Should we remove all those acronyms that didn't live beyond the post in which they were coined (comprising most of them)? For example, listies frequently used MAGIC DISHWASHER and LOLLIPOPS as shorthand for their respective theories, but IMPISH LLAMA DRAPE and I GOT YOUR PARALLELISM RIGHT HERE MISTER never caught on, clever though they are. Furthermore, "George" is by far the most-used (and most personified) Snapetheory, but it's not an acronym. As the curator of Inish Alley and erstwhile participant in TBAY, I can help mark which acronyms became useful to the list (and therefore to the catalogue) and which did not. 3) Am I to understand that we are not to monkey with the categories as of yet, i.e., we can neither create, edit, nor destroy? That should be enough for now. --Dicentra From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Sat Apr 24 09:36:15 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 09:36:15 -0000 Subject: UPDATE Sunday 18th April: We're in business In-Reply-To: Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "Dicentra spectabilis" wrote: > 1) Should we add a text field wherein the cataloguer can add a comment if desired, such as "includes minute-by-minute breakdown of Shrieking Shack scene." This would aid the FAQers tremendously. Carolyn: I would have no problem with this, but its one for Paul to sort out how it could be achieved. I guess it would be an optional text box on the category list - Paul: what would be the implications of this? I added one category 'Fantastic Post' which we could click if we were really wowed by something, but this would be a further enhancement. > > 2) I noticed that most of the Inish Alley acronyms have been made > categories. Should we remove all those acronyms that didn't live > beyond the post in which they were coined (comprising most of them)? For example, listies frequently used MAGIC DISHWASHER and LOLLIPOPS as shorthand for their respective theories, but IMPISH LLAMA DRAPE and I GOT YOUR PARALLELISM RIGHT HERE MISTER never caught on, clever though they are. Furthermore, "George" is by far the most- used (and most personified) Snapetheory, but it's not an acronym. > > As the curator of Inish Alley and erstwhile participant in TBAY, I can help mark which acronyms became useful to the list (and therefore to the catalogue) and which did not. Carolyn: Hm. Interesting point. One of my big gripes with the FP section as it currently stands is that it doesn't give a quick, clear summary of where a theory stopped, started and diverged. A lot of post numbers are quoted, but usually too many, and they often repeat themselves in a confusing way. My idea on this category list was to provide a definitive list of which posts related to which acronym (even if it was only ever one post), so people could follow a theory thread right through and know where it started and stopped. However, I hear what you are saying and we could have a rule that if an acronym generated no more than one or two posts that it gets downgraded and just coded up to its constituent parts. For IMPISH LLAMA DRAPE (Impoverished Molly's Parenting Isn't So Harsh! Lousy Lunches and Maroon Apparel Don't Render a Parent Evil), this would mean the post (36045) would simply get coded to Molly Weasley in section 2, and perhaps also the 'parenting' code in section 1. I could live with this. George isn't an acronym, of course. However, its a term so widely used, I thought it might be useful to have it on our list, in order that people can follow through the whole wild series of mentions, and understand what it was all about (or not, as the case may be ). > > 3) Am I to understand that we are not to monkey with the categories as of yet, i.e., we can neither create, edit, nor destroy? Carolyn: Um, yes, if you don't mind. If people do this on their own initiative, it means other people could be actively coding up to a category which has just been deleted or re-named to mean something else. I can imagine this making everyone very cross, so I am proposing that we post ideas for changes on this site, discuss them as necessary, and then I implement the agreed ones in one go, perhaps once a week, and record those changes in my update, so everyone knows what is happening. Its a bit clumsy, but I can't think of any other way of doing it at the moment. Also, whilst making additions to the category list is straightforward enough, deleting categories causes quite a lot of problems. In fact, if I understand Paul correctly, we can't actually do it if anything has been coded up to the category so far - he will have to physically move those posts to another location first. Some of the same problems occur if we re-name a category - we have to consider the effect of that on what is coded to the category so far. At this stage, the lists of posts are relatively short, but by the time we get into many thousands of posts, the consequences have to be considered fairly carefully. In fact, when we have a bigger team working on the project, we will probably have to 'lock' the category list in some way to prevent accidents. > > That should be enough for now. > > --Dicentra Please don't apologise - I am relieved and keen to discuss the project in this kind of detail at long last. Its been in my head for so long ! From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Sat Apr 24 13:47:07 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 13:47:07 -0000 Subject: Thanks to Kneasy Message-ID: Just like to say a big thanks to Barry for his recent post 96852, essentially in defence of theorising. I will be quite honest and say I have come close to leaving HPfGU for a while (eg until the next book) because of the slurry of apple pie that seemed to have been tipped over every interesting post recently. I suppose its all part of the natural life-cycle of a group like this - the main action and the naughty sharp minds pile in until they get bored, then its left to others to pick over the bits until something new happens. There also seems to be a great hidden worry that the books might not turn out to be a nice series for kids after all. Asserting that JKR 'couldn't possibly' do this that or the other seems to me a way of steadily marginalising the more inventive thinkers, and asserting the views of the more conservative majority. 'Twas ever thus, and I suppose that's democracy for you etc, but as one of life's awkward squad it has me biting the carpet. I have no more knowledge of JKR's eventual intentions than anyone else, but I do know I will be profoundly disappointed at a simplistic, 'happy ever after' ending. I take courage from her evident feisty temper, sarcastic British sense of humour, and the complexity of what she has produced so far. I'm sticking with HPfGU for now mainly because we have this project just off the ground, which I hope will help find and celebrate the most interesting thinking from the past. The intention being to showcase those posts/threads in a way that will hopefully raise the quality and standards of posting on the list in time for the deluge that will accompany Book 6. Over time and the publication of Books 6 and 7, I hope the project will continue to build so that we have a ready-made source for constructing that book of the alternative Potterverse which Kneasy mentioned recently, and which I suggested when I first proposed the project to Admin, back in August last year. If we do the work carefully, it should be possible to pull out the best, the wackiest, the most plain wrong, funniest etc (not mutually exclusive categories), which we could pull together into a book published for charity, and presented to her with our compliments. Sorry..a bit of a rant and a manifesto for why I want the catalogue to happen. Couldn't post it on the main list because we are not ready to announce the project, and anyway, really couldn't face the depressing task of slugging it out with Geoff, Jim, Steve etc. Thank goodness Barry is willing to do it. Carolyn From paul-groups at wibbles.org Sat Apr 24 20:24:47 2004 From: paul-groups at wibbles.org (Paul Kippes) Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 13:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Subject: {groups} [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: UPDATE Sunday 18th April: We're in business In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040424202447.84793.qmail@web13803.mail.yahoo.com> --- a_reader2003 wrote: --------------------------------- --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "Dicentra spectabilis" wrote: > 1) Should we add a text field wherein the cataloguer can add a comment if desired, such as "includes minute-by-minute breakdown of Shrieking Shack scene." This would aid the FAQers tremendously. Carolyn: I would have no problem with this, but its one for Paul to sort out how it could be achieved. I guess it would be an optional text box on the category list - Paul: what would be the implications of this? This would be no problem. I just need to do some testing. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25 http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Sun Apr 25 09:21:01 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:21:01 +0100 Subject: {groups} [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: UPDATE Sunday 18th April: We're in business In-Reply-To: <20040424202447.84793.qmail@web13803.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040424202447.84793.qmail@web13803.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Dunno if I'm doing something wrong (probable) or if the mail I sent yesterday to Paul at the Yahoo! address quoted in Carolyn's instruction sheet requesting access never got there (very possible), but - help! Locked out in the cold, unloved, cast aside like an old shoe, forced to submit to a consideration of the crop rotation of mandrakes when I could be quaffing draughts from the well-springs of wisdom. What do I try next? Barry From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Sun Apr 25 10:23:18 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:23:18 -0000 Subject: {groups} [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: UPDATE Sunday 18th April: We're in business In-Reply-To: Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > Dunno if I'm doing something wrong (probable) or if the mail I sent > yesterday to Paul at the Yahoo! address quoted in Carolyn's instruction > sheet requesting access never got there (very possible), but - help! > Locked out in the cold, unloved, cast aside like an old shoe, forced > to submit to a consideration of the crop rotation of mandrakes when I > could be quaffing draughts from the well-springs of wisdom. > > What do I try next? > > Barry Patience sir, Paul is a resident of the US of A and probably enjoying his beauty sleep right now ! Also, be sure to hit the site address with your browser as well as email Paul. Although you won't get in, the site collects your computer's details, which Paul then uses to set up your access. He visits this site regularly, and will have you up and running in no time. Looking forward to your reactions to it all. Cheers Carolyn From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Sun Apr 25 11:04:25 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 12:04:25 +0100 Subject: {groups} [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: UPDATE Sunday 18th April: We're in business In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5075A908-96A8-11D8-A61E-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> > > Patience sir, Paul is a resident of the US of A and probably enjoying > his beauty sleep right now ! Also, be sure to hit the site address > with your browser as well as email Paul. Although you won't get in, > the site collects your computer's details, which Paul then uses to > set up your access. He visits this site regularly, and will have you > up and running in no time. > > Looking forward to your reactions to it all. > > Cheers > Carolyn > > > > I did all that, and I sent the e-mail 1546 BST yesterday to allow him a lie-in on a Saturday morning. The fact that he answered a message from Dicentra later yesterday makes me think that Yahoo!Mort has struck again. Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 850 bytes Desc: not available URL: From paul-groups at wibbles.org Sun Apr 25 16:15:45 2004 From: paul-groups at wibbles.org (Paul Kippes) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 09:15:45 -0700 (PDT) Subject: {groups} Re: {groups} [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: UPDATE Sunday 18th April: We're in business In-Reply-To: <5075A908-96A8-11D8-A61E-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Message-ID: <20040425161545.60002.qmail@web13801.mail.yahoo.com> I missed it or accidentally deleted it. You should be able to see the site now. --- Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > > > > > Patience sir, Paul is a resident of the US of A and probably > enjoying > > his beauty sleep right now ! Also, be sure to hit the site > address > > with your browser as well as email Paul. Although you won't get > in, > > the site collects your computer's details, which Paul then uses > to > > set up your access. He visits this site regularly, and will have > you > > up and running in no time. > > > > Looking forward to your reactions to it all. > > > > Cheers > > Carolyn > > > > > > > > > > I did all that, and I sent the e-mail 1546 BST yesterday to allow > him > a lie-in on a Saturday morning. > > The fact that he answered a message from Dicentra later yesterday > makes me think that Yahoo!Mort has struck again. > > Barry > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25 http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Sun Apr 25 16:50:24 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 17:50:24 +0100 Subject: {groups} Re: {groups} [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: UPDATE Sunday 18th April: We're in business In-Reply-To: <20040425161545.60002.qmail@web13801.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040425161545.60002.qmail@web13801.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Thanks for the info - *but* I browse back to the mystic numbers, the page remains blank and then I get timed out after 60 seconds by Safari. Is this the revenge of the machines? Barry On 25 Apr 2004, at 17:15, Paul Kippes wrote: > I missed it or accidentally deleted it. You should be able to see > the site now. > > --- Barry Arrowsmith wrote: >> >>> >>> Patience sir, Paul is a resident of the US of A and probably >> enjoying >>> his beauty sleep right now ! Also, be sure to hit the site >> address >>> with your browser as well as email Paul. Although you won't get >> in, >>> the site collects your computer's details, which Paul then uses >> to >>> set up your access. He visits this site regularly, and will have >> you >>> up and running in no time. >>> >>> Looking forward to your reactions to it all. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Carolyn >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> I did all that, and I sent the e-mail 1546 BST yesterday to allow >> him >> a lie-in on a Saturday morning. >> >> The fact that he answered a message from Dicentra later yesterday >> makes me think that Yahoo!Mort has struck again. >> >> Barry >> >> > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25? > http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ---------------------~--> > Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark > Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & > Canada. > http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 > http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/1hIolB/TM > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > ~-> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > From paul-groups at wibbles.org Sun Apr 25 17:44:58 2004 From: paul-groups at wibbles.org (Paul Kippes) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:44:58 -0700 (PDT) Subject: {groups} Re: {groups} Re: {groups} [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: UPDATE Sunday 18th April: We're in business In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040425174458.2016.qmail@web13807.mail.yahoo.com> I've dropped my firewall until I can sort this out. Should have worked....but didn't. --- Barry Arrowsmith wrote: --------------------------------- Thanks for the info - *but* I browse back to the mystic numbers, the page remains blank and then I get timed out after 60 seconds by Safari. Is this the revenge of the machines? Barry On 25 Apr 2004, at 17:15, Paul Kippes wrote: > I missed it or accidentally deleted it. You should be able to see > the site now. > > --- Barry Arrowsmith wrote: >> >>> >>> Patience sir, Paul is a resident of the US of A and probably >> enjoying >>> his beauty sleep right now ! Also, be sure to hit the site >> address >>> with your browser as well as email Paul. Although you won't get >> in, >>> the site collects your computer's details, which Paul then uses >> to >>> set up your access. He visits this site regularly, and will have >> you >>> up and running in no time. >>> >>> Looking forward to your reactions to it all. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Carolyn >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> I did all that, and I sent the e-mail 1546 BST yesterday to allow >> him >> a lie-in on a Saturday morning. >> >> The fact that he answered a message from Dicentra later yesterday >> makes me think that Yahoo!Mort has struck again. >> >> Barry >> >> > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25 > http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ---------------------~--> > Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark > Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & > Canada. > http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 > http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/1hIolB/TM > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > ~-> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > --------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPFGU-Catalogue/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: HPFGU-Catalogue-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25 http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Sun Apr 25 22:17:06 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 22:17:06 -0000 Subject: UPDATE Sunday 25th April Message-ID: Ok, so we've got started. 1700 posts either coded or allocated so far on the Yahoo Club. Other items: 1. Dicentra requested a text box for comments useful to the FAQ team. Paul says that's possible and is implementing it. Maybe Dicentra could give us a list of the sort of comments they'd like us to put in - what issues are they really looking for ? 2. Theory acronyms. As most of them only amount to one post, we will downgrade a lot of them from their Level 3 heading status, and just code them up like any other post. My inclination is to leave the heads as they are for now (as they are tedious to edit), and we deal with them as we come to them. Mostly this won't start to happen until posts 20 000 onwards on the main list I think. 3. Barry I'm assuming you got into the site in the end ? Carolyn From paul-groups at wibbles.org Mon Apr 26 05:00:44 2004 From: paul-groups at wibbles.org (kippesp) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 05:00:44 -0000 Subject: UPDATE Sunday 18th April: We're in business In-Reply-To: Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "Dicentra spectabilis" wrote: > 1) Should we add a text field wherein the cataloguer can add a comment > if desired, such as "includes minute-by-minute breakdown of Shrieking > Shack scene." This would aid the FAQers tremendously. This is now in place. But there will be problems with some browsers if we get near 500 characters. I'll get this fixed by next weekend. You'll know that you hit the problem when the form doesn't submit/refresh after clicking 'Set Category.' From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Mon Apr 26 07:58:10 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 08:58:10 +0100 Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] UPDATE Sunday 25th April In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <764314E2-9757-11D8-9C1A-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> On 25 Apr 2004, at 23:17, a_reader2003 wrote: > Ok, so we've got started. 1700 posts either coded or allocated so far > on the Yahoo Club. > > Other items: > > 3. Barry I'm assuming you got into the site in the end ? > > Carolyn > > > Er, no. There's obviously a problem or conflict somewhere resulting in lock-out. Frustrating. Just have to hope that our consultant techno-wizard can get to the bottom of it. Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 521 bytes Desc: not available URL: From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Mon Apr 26 10:55:09 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:55:09 +0100 Subject: Thanks, Paul Message-ID: <2F903E20-9770-11D8-9C1A-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Once again, Yahoo seems determined to thwart my progress. The mail below was sent out earlier this morning and promptly ignored by Yahoo! Typical. Any road up and be that as it may, if Carolyn would like to send me a batch number I might actually get down to doing something constructive, remembering to take into account the 6 month training scheme, the productivity bonus, the extreme hazard remuneration and the mutual hatred that exists between me and modern technology. On 26 Apr 2004, at 09:25, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > I'm in! At the third attempt this morning. > > Many thanks for your time and trouble. > > Now I can put past posters to the fire and sword. > > Barry > > > On 26 Apr 2004, at 09:17, Paul Kippes wrote: > >> Barry, >> >> I'm really sorry about this. The timezone situation doesn't help >> things. Give it another go and I check back in 7 hours from now.... >> >> --- Barry Arrowsmith wrote: >>> >>> On 25 Apr 2004, at 23:17, a_reader2003 wrote: >>> >>>> Ok, so we've got started. 1700 posts either coded or allocated so >>> far >>>> on the Yahoo Club. >>>> >>>> Other items: >>>> >>>> 3. Barry I'm assuming you got into the site in the end ? >>>> >>>> Carolyn >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Er, no. >>> >>> There's obviously a problem or conflict somewhere resulting in >>> lock-out. >>> Frustrating. >>> >>> Just have to hope that our consultant techno-wizard can get to the >>> bottom of it. >>> >>> Barry >>> From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Mon Apr 26 11:17:11 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:17:11 -0000 Subject: Thanks, Paul In-Reply-To: <2F903E20-9770-11D8-9C1A-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > Once again, Yahoo seems determined to thwart my progress. > The mail below was sent out earlier this morning and promptly ignored > by Yahoo! Typical. > > Any road up and be that as it may, if Carolyn would like to send me a > batch number I might actually get down to doing something > constructive, remembering to take into account the 6 month training > scheme, the productivity bonus, the extreme hazard remuneration and the > mutual hatred that exists between me and modern technology. > Carolyn: Hooray..the back list trembles at the approach of the man with the AK47.. (suddenly wonders if this is JKR's real source for 'Avada Kedavra', but I digress..). Can you take posts 1701-2200 ? I find I can do approx 100 per hour, but less if they get complex. Erm.. the idea is to code most things that have some merit, rather than blow them all out of the water at this stage ! It is rather humbling to find how many of our current 'new' posts are identical to all these back in 1999. However, there is a lot of movie chat and OT, which may mean a lot of rejects. Check up the thread to see how it has been previously coded - but feel free to disagree .... (surely not). From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Mon Apr 26 17:12:34 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:12:34 +0100 Subject: Is there? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Is there a category number for the Pavarti twins? If there is I must have a blind-spot when their names slide past. Barry From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Mon Apr 26 18:28:18 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 19:28:18 +0100 Subject: Is there... Message-ID: <7D44CC9A-97AF-11D8-9C1A-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> ... a category for the pictures? BTW I've just gone through about 100 posts and 85% are rejects - chat about signing sessions, buying Hogwarts mugs, audio tapes etc, etc. If it doesn't improve soon some of these posters are going to get a Howler. Barry From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Mon Apr 26 18:57:34 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:57:34 -0000 Subject: RE Parvati twins (was Is there?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > Is there a category number for the Pavarti twins? > > If there is I must have a blind-spot when their names slide past. > > Barry Carolyn: No, I will put them on now. I have not as yet put all the Hogwart's pupils on - the list is so long, I thought I'd wait and see what came up. However, I will now put on a bigger selection of the better known ones. From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Mon Apr 26 19:05:28 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 19:05:28 -0000 Subject: Is there... In-Reply-To: <7D44CC9A-97AF-11D8-9C1A-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > ... a category for the pictures? > > BTW I've just gone through about 100 posts and 85% are rejects - chat > about signing sessions, buying Hogwarts mugs, audio tapes etc, etc. > > If it doesn't improve soon some of these posters are going to get a > Howler. > > Barry Carolyn: Yes, pictures are under the WW media & culture section somewhere - photos and portraits. Its unfortunate that you have got such a boring bunch of rejects - I did too for the last couple of hundred I did. Then it erupts into something interesting all of a sudden. You can see why Admin tightened up the rules ! The upside is we can get rid of them quickly and get on to the interesting stuff. If you are feeling bored visit the posts I put under 'bannings and contraversies' all relating to a certain Mr Beckhorn. It all turned out to be an elaborate joke in the end, but is an entertaining read. Wonderfully, after they find it IS a joke, it develops into a real argument ! Alas, most of these guys are long gone I expect - although Neil (FlyingFordAnglia) is surely still a member somewhere. From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Mon Apr 26 20:55:24 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 20:55:24 -0000 Subject: Illiterate posts Message-ID: I am just working on posts from 2200 onwards and have come across a near-illiterate poster, david_thebravest. I had started to reject his posts simply as unreadable, and was pleased to find that the other list members also started to protest after a bit, so I feel justified. Therefore, I have created a new reject category - 'unreadable/illiterate'. Bit of a harsh judgement, but life's too short to sort everything out. From paul-groups at wibbles.org Mon Apr 26 21:59:20 2004 From: paul-groups at wibbles.org (Paul Kippes) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: {groups} [HPFGU-Catalogue] Illiterate posts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040426215920.1837.qmail@web13811.mail.yahoo.com> He had only 26 posts: +-------------+-------------+ | post_number | post_source | +-------------+-------------+ | 2145 | YCLUB | | 2147 | YCLUB | | 2148 | YCLUB | | 2204 | YCLUB | | 2217 | YCLUB | | 2219 | YCLUB | | 2220 | YCLUB | | 2221 | YCLUB | | 2222 | YCLUB | | 2225 | YCLUB | | 2226 | YCLUB | | 2227 | YCLUB | | 2229 | YCLUB | | 2231 | YCLUB | | 2234 | YCLUB | | 2236 | YCLUB | | 2252 | YCLUB | | 2253 | YCLUB | | 2256 | YCLUB | | 2260 | YCLUB | | 2367 | YCLUB | | 2370 | YCLUB | | 2382 | YCLUB | | 2383 | YCLUB | | 2468 | YCLUB | | 2563 | YCLUB | +-------------+-------------+ --- a_reader2003 wrote: --------------------------------- I am just working on posts from 2200 onwards and have come across a near-illiterate poster, david_thebravest. I had started to reject his posts simply as unreadable, and was pleased to find that the other list members also started to protest after a bit, so I feel justified. Therefore, I have created a new reject category - 'unreadable/illiterate'. Bit of a harsh judgement, but life's too short to sort everything out. --------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPFGU-Catalogue/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: HPFGU-Catalogue-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25 http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Tue Apr 27 16:50:26 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 16:50:26 -0000 Subject: Barry - you want some more posts ? Message-ID: Great stuff, we are beginning to crack through them. Do you want to take 2701-3200 ? I think GOF must be published by then, so hopefully more interesting. Carolyn From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Tue Apr 27 17:00:34 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:00:34 +0100 Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] Illiterate posts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6608082F-986C-11D8-BA68-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Yep, I've got him in 2145. Seems to have the brains of a hamster and puts together his posts by randomly attacking the keyboard, but he does make one observation I've not seen elsewhere. Trelawney warns Pavil Pavarti that she must beware of a red-headed man. He seems to see it as a SHIPping forecast that ends badly. There was also enormous confusion about what JKR's OBE was all about - a knightship or a military award? BTW - you've a category for 'humour in the books' - how about one for humour in posts? They can be entertaining in their own right but may otherwise be rejected as adding nothing new to the discussion. Yeah, I'll take the 2701s but progress will be slower; I've been occupying myself with this lot while waiting for some work to arrive - and it did an hour ago. Barry On 26 Apr 2004, at 21:55, a_reader2003 wrote: > I am just working on posts from 2200 onwards and have come across a > near-illiterate poster, david_thebravest. I had started to reject his > posts simply as unreadable, and was pleased to find that the other > list members also started to protest after a bit, so I feel > justified. Therefore, I have created a new reject category - > 'unreadable/illiterate'. > > Bit of a harsh judgement, but life's too short to sort everything out. > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > ? To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPFGU-Catalogue/ > ? > ? To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > HPFGU-Catalogue-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com > ? > ? Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service. > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 1996 bytes Desc: not available URL: From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Tue Apr 27 18:27:52 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:27:52 -0000 Subject: daft posts In-Reply-To: <6608082F-986C-11D8-BA68-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > > There was also enormous confusion about what JKR's OBE was all about - a knightship or a military award? > > BTW - you've a category for 'humour in the books' - how about one for humour in posts? Carolyn: No kidding ? Too funny. I think we should simply have a category called 'just for a laugh' or some such.. From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Tue Apr 27 22:27:33 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 22:27:33 -0000 Subject: Query Message-ID: I am currently dealing with a series of posts speculating on why Harry has to go to the Dursleys each summer, and the nature of the protection which Dumbledore thinks that gives him (this is pre-GOF). Any views on where they should go ? I have tentatively logged them against the last chapter of POA, as that is where the discussion began. But I wonder if they should also be coded elsewhere. What do you think ? Carolyn From paul-groups at wibbles.org Wed Apr 28 04:35:12 2004 From: paul-groups at wibbles.org (kippesp) Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 04:35:12 -0000 Subject: Slow connection Message-ID: My internet connection is dog slow right now. This hardly ever happens. But if the catalog doesn't show up, that's why. Barry--I'd like to put the firewall back up on Wednesday. I probably will 12 hours from now (5-6 pm ish UK time). I think the reason you were having trouble before was that you were using your full name when attempting to log in. Now that you know what to expect, I think I'm safe in putting this back in place. In looking through my logs, I see nothing to indicate you'll have problems with added. From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Wed Apr 28 07:16:49 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:16:49 +0100 Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] Slow connection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <03C425F4-98E4-11D8-A588-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Sure, OK, give it a try. Yes, I did attempt to enter with an inappropriate name (trust me to get it wrong) but the attempts I made before that (about 5, I think) it never even got to the password drop-down. All I had was a totally blank page. Dunno why, but this sort of thing has been happening to me ever since I can remember. For some reason any glitch in a system lies in wait until Arrowsmith, fat and happy, tries doing something that others have no difficulty with at all, particularly with computer systems. In govt. depts. I'm the one whose records have got screwed up or lost or deleted. It's depressing. Once I damn near killed a patient because a computer did something that was 'impossible'. It switched parameters on a blood gases machine print-out. I won''t give the whole horror story, but if it hadn't been for my total mistrust of technology due to past experiences, I probably wouldn't have got suspicious and cross-checked on another piece of equipment. Anyway, I'll try logging on later this evening. A triumph of hope over experience. Barry On 28 Apr 2004, at 05:35, kippesp wrote: > My internet connection is dog slow right now.? This hardly ever > happens.? But if the catalog doesn't show up, that's why. > > Barry--I'd like to put the firewall back up on Wednesday.? I > probably will 12 hours from now (5-6 pm ish UK time).? I think the > reason you were having trouble before was that you were using your > full name when attempting to log in.? Now that you know what to > expect, I think I'm safe in putting this back in place.? In looking > through my logs, I see nothing to indicate you'll have problems with > added. > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > ? To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPFGU-Catalogue/ > ? > ? To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > HPFGU-Catalogue-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com > ? > ? Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service. > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 2410 bytes Desc: not available URL: From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Wed Apr 28 08:46:44 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:46:44 +0100 Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] Query In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9397BB92-98F0-11D8-A588-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> It's difficult, I agree. Under 1.3.4. foreshadowing, clues etc? Or does it go far enough to count as a prediction? Got to ask, is 1.3.4. intended for the sort of thing you've come up against, or is it intended to be used for retrospective analysis - as in "if we look back it's obvious that...? 'Cos I've been using it in the former case - as in " Here's something we ought to take notice of - bet it means something, but I'm not sure what." Had a post that wondered what the result of the paired wands would mean. It was seen as an important clue, but to what? They didn't know and couldn't guess, but worth a credit just the same. And there's an awful lot of posts that boil down to "What does this mean, is it significant? Will it tie in with that?" and we probably won't know if it was reader paranoia until No. 7 is published. Have to fit 'em in somewhere. Barry On 27 Apr 2004, at 23:27, a_reader2003 wrote: > I am currently dealing with a series of posts speculating on why > Harry has to go to the Dursleys each summer, and the nature of the > protection which Dumbledore thinks that gives him (this is pre-GOF). > Any views on where they should go ? I have tentatively logged them > against the last chapter of POA, as that is where the discussion > began. But I wonder if they should also be coded elsewhere. What do > you think ? > > Carolyn > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > ? To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPFGU-Catalogue/ > ? > ? To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > HPFGU-Catalogue-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com > ? > ? Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service. > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 2083 bytes Desc: not available URL: From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Wed Apr 28 09:40:23 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:40:23 -0000 Subject: Query In-Reply-To: <9397BB92-98F0-11D8-A588-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > It's difficult, I agree. > > Under 1.3.4. foreshadowing, clues etc? Or does it go far enough to > count as a prediction? > Got to ask, is 1.3.4. intended for the sort of thing you've come up > against, or is it intended to be used for retrospective analysis - as in "if we look back it's obvious that...? 'Cos I've been using it in the former case - as in " Here's something we ought to take notice of - bet it means something, but I'm not sure what." Had a post that wondered what the result of the paired wands would mean. It was seen as an important clue, but to what? They didn't know and couldn't guess, but worth a credit just the same. And there's an awful lot of posts that boil down to "What does this mean, is it significant? Will it tie in with that?" and we probably won't know if it was reader paranoia until No. 7 is published. Have to fit 'em in somewhere. > Carolyn: Mmm. Its tricky. I think the category can probably be used for both, the ones you have been coding there serving as examples. We could perhaps separate out posts which just talked about the use of foreshadowing/clues as a literary technique into a separate sub- category within 1.3.4. But in the examples you quoted, and the one I am trying to deal with, they obviously would be coded up elsewhere as well. I am putting a lot of these kind of things into their right place in the chapter listings. Often, they are the kind of queries that come up in the chapter-by-chapter discussions. Or, I am ticking a relevant character or magical item - the marauder's map, the invisibility cloak etc. On your wands, I would probably tick 'wands' plus Voldie & Harry, and um, Ollivander (who needs to be put on the list..I will go and do this right away). Oh, and I would click the graveyard scene in GOF - the posts you have found being an excellent background discussion to what did happen there. Is this too much ? One of the advantages we have is knowing the relevance of a lot of their speculations. Returning to my problem, I was wondering whether to add a category called 'prophecy' to the section on free-will, determinism etc. There have been a lot of spot-on predictions about what both Trelawny's prophecies were about; it might be useful to pull them out to read separately. I have been linking them into the last-but-one chapter in OOP where DD finally 'reveals' what it was all about, or the prophecy chapter in POA so far. From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Wed Apr 28 10:14:15 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:14:15 +0100 Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: Query In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Something else. Not totally sure how you define WICCA. Can I use it as a dumping ground for posts that postulate/hope that their favourite /astrology/cultish/new age delusions can be imposed on HP? I've run into a thread where the Houses are being assigned to supposed astrological signs based on personality traits of the House symbols(!). And I just know it'll bring the loonies out of the woodwork to join in. Looks like a long thread. Barry From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Wed Apr 28 11:12:01 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:12:01 -0000 Subject: Query In-Reply-To: Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > Something else. > > Not totally sure how you define WICCA. > > Can I use it as a dumping ground for posts that postulate/hope that > their favourite /astrology/cultish/new age delusions can be imposed on > HP? > > I've run into a thread where the Houses are being assigned to supposed > astrological signs based on personality traits of the House symbols (!). Carolyn: Ah, no..Wicca is something fairly specific apparently - see some of the posts already allocated there. JKR is alleged to have said in an interview that she is Wiccan.. I have just added 'astrology' as a sub-section within symbolism, as it comes up fairly regularly. Hopefully other sub-sections within symbolism will be a suitable resting place for the other stuff you are coming across ! From paul-groups at wibbles.org Wed Apr 28 15:41:01 2004 From: paul-groups at wibbles.org (Paul Kippes) Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:41:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: {groups} Re: [HPFGU-Catalogue] Slow connection In-Reply-To: <03C425F4-98E4-11D8-A588-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Message-ID: <20040428154101.93616.qmail@web13809.mail.yahoo.com> Well, to support your suspensions.... I just read an article about a US software company that is being sued because its confusing software gave out 100 times too much of the wrong radiation and killed several patients. The programmer is on trial for manslaughter charges. http://www.baselinemag.com/article2/0,1397,1544403,00.asp --- Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > Sure, OK, give it a try. > > Yes, I did attempt to enter with an inappropriate name (trust me to > get > it wrong) but the attempts I made before that (about 5, I think) > it > never even got to the password drop-down. All I had was a totally > blank page. > > Dunno why, but this sort of thing has been happening to me ever > since I can remember. For some reason any glitch in a system lies > in > wait until Arrowsmith, fat and happy, tries doing something that > others > have no difficulty with at all, particularly with computer systems. > In > govt. depts. I'm the one whose records have got screwed up or lost > or > deleted. It's depressing. > Once I damn near killed a patient because a computer did something > > that was 'impossible'. It switched parameters on a blood gases > machine > print-out. I won''t give the whole horror story, but if it hadn't > > been for my total mistrust of technology due to past experiences, > I > probably wouldn't have got suspicious and cross-checked on another > > piece of equipment. > > Anyway, I'll try logging on later this evening. > A triumph of hope over experience. > > Barry > > > On 28 Apr 2004, at 05:35, kippesp wrote: > > > My internet connection is dog slow right now. This hardly ever > > happens. But if the catalog doesn't show up, that's why. > > > > Barry--I'd like to put the firewall back up on Wednesday. I > > probably will 12 hours from now (5-6 pm ish UK time). I think > the > > reason you were having trouble before was that you were using > your > > full name when attempting to log in. Now that you know what to > > expect, I think I'm safe in putting this back in place. In > looking > > through my logs, I see nothing to indicate you'll have problems > with > > added. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > To visit your group on the web, go to: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPFGU-Catalogue/ > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > HPFGU-Catalogue-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > > Service. > > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Wed Apr 28 15:48:28 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:48:28 +0100 Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] Slow connection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7E35FB12-992B-11D8-B72A-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> You're right about it being slow. The posts load OK, but when I 'set category' it doesn't always reset the category section properly afterwards and prevents entries on the next post. Instead it changes the previously set categories on the preceding post to those I'm trying to enter for the current one. Clicking the 'Go' button doesn't help most of the time either. It's out to get me. It won't be radiation, it'll be frustration that does me in. Barry From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Wed Apr 28 17:01:40 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:01:40 -0000 Subject: Slow connection In-Reply-To: <7E35FB12-992B-11D8-B72A-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > You're right about it being slow. ...... > > It won't be radiation, it'll be frustration that does me in. > > Barry Carolyn: You are not alone Barry ! I have had the same problems all day. I assumed it was my AOL browser playing up.... Also (Paul) when I made some changes to the categories, the site just hung, although when I crashed out and came back they seem to have been implemented. Any theories what the problem is ?? Carolyn From paul-groups at wibbles.org Wed Apr 28 17:42:17 2004 From: paul-groups at wibbles.org (Paul Kippes) Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: {groups} [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: Slow connection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040428174217.21421.qmail@web13804.mail.yahoo.com> I can't control what my ISP gives me. The site and computer are fine. But the throughput isn't there. Even for me, I'm not getting the category page to load. And on a good day, I'd expect things to be even slower from Britain. --- a_reader2003 wrote: --------------------------------- --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > You're right about it being slow. ...... > > It won't be radiation, it'll be frustration that does me in. > > Barry Carolyn: You are not alone Barry ! I have had the same problems all day. I assumed it was my AOL browser playing up.... Also (Paul) when I made some changes to the categories, the site just hung, although when I crashed out and came back they seem to have been implemented. Any theories what the problem is ?? Carolyn --------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPFGU-Catalogue/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: HPFGU-Catalogue-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Thu Apr 29 05:52:56 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:52:56 +0100 Subject: {groups} [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: Slow connection In-Reply-To: <20040428174217.21421.qmail@web13804.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040428174217.21421.qmail@web13804.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <76C84168-99A1-11D8-9BBA-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Understood. Have you re-installed your firewall? The reason I ask is that I can't access your site. It's the old 'timed out after 60 seconds of attempting to open the page' problem. Could it be that Safari has peculiar characteristics that cause problems? Barry On 28 Apr 2004, at 18:42, Paul Kippes wrote: > I can't control what my ISP gives me.? The site and computer are > fine.? But the throughput isn't there.? Even for me, I'm not getting > the category page to load.? And on a good day, I'd expect things to > be even slower from Britain. > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 638 bytes Desc: not available URL: From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Thu Apr 29 07:57:27 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 07:57:27 -0000 Subject: Site now back up to speed Message-ID: Relieved to say that the site now seems to be working fine again. I still tend to have a display problem as I first load it, but clicking 'refresh' seems to solve that (I think is probably an AOL related issue). Anyway, I coded a few hundred posts this morning without difficulties. Amazing how addictive it becomes ! Hope you two can figure a way of getting Barry back into the site, despite the firewall. BTW, I noticed that the Convention Alley email this morning is advertising a presentation from Steve van Der Ark on the dangers of over-analysing Harry..... Carolyn From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Thu Apr 29 08:03:00 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:03:00 +0100 Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] - is there.. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: ...a category for Boggarts? Barry From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Thu Apr 29 08:14:57 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:14:57 -0000 Subject: - is there.. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > ...a category for Boggarts? > > Barry Carolyn: There is now ! Under Spirits..after Dementors From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Thu Apr 29 08:26:31 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:26:31 +0100 Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] - mails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dunno what's wrong with the mail this morning, but I've sent two messages to the board to let Paul know that I'm in and that he needn't keep tinkering. Neither have been posted. This is bloody ridiculous. If it weren't for the fact that I get my messages returned to me from the board and these never came back, I'd never have realised that they'd gone missing/were delayed until who knows when. It's nearly as bad as the Post Office. Barry From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Thu Apr 29 09:30:32 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:30:32 +0100 Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: - is there.. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hum. Hate to keep doing this, but is it worthwhile listing the Sorting Hat as a magical object in it's own right as a Magical Item? I've got somebody wondering if it's possessed by a spirit or ghost. Not exactly a sorting into Houses post. The problem is, the list is enormous already - if it gets much longer we might as well give 'em the damn files and tell 'em it's all in there somewhere. Barry On 29 Apr 2004, at 09:14, a_reader2003 wrote: > --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith > wrote: > > ...a category for Boggarts? > > > > Barry > > Carolyn: > There is now ! Under Spirits..after Dementors > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > ? To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPFGU-Catalogue/ > ? > ? To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > HPFGU-Catalogue-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com > ? > ? Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service. > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 1348 bytes Desc: not available URL: From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Thu Apr 29 09:47:12 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:47:12 -0000 Subject: - is there.. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > Hum. > > Hate to keep doing this, but is it worthwhile listing the Sorting Hat > as a magical object in it's own right as a Magical Item? > I've got somebody wondering if it's possessed by a spirit or ghost. Carolyn: I'll add it as a sub-category within the Hogwart's sorting section. Hopefully the list will shorten a good deal when we remove the theory acronyms that attract very few posts. Also, we should start to discuss with Paul how the threads will eventually get displayed. At the moment we can do a quick look-see by clicking the 's' after each category, but that generates a flat list of names and numbers, not a live list of the actual posts. Once we are able to see the posts as a live list, firstly we will no doubt spot some categorising mistakes/conflicts and need to correct this. Second we might delete even more, having reviewed how often a point has been made. Third, probably there needs to be a visual grouping mechanism, so that you can see distinct threads as one entity. One way of showing threads would be to have +/- type display, where you can open/close groups of threads as you browse a list. What might be a good way of naming such threads - date ? Post nos ? Subject ? From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Thu Apr 29 10:48:38 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:48:38 +0100 Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: - is there.. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: ...and yet another going on about the origin of Golden Snitches! "Do they have a larval form?" Before "Quidditch Through the Ages" and not really worth a separate category, I think. I've got a feeling that very few of the theory acronyms will be used much, saving a small number that keep recurring, like MAGIC DISHWASHER. And there are over 300 of 'em. Unless, unlike MAGIC DISHWASHER, they only occurred two or three times in the distant past (which to most posters starts last Thursday), they won't have any reason to add them to their search parameters anyway. They most likely have no idea that they exist in relation to their object of interest. Would it be possible to eventually tie in the Inish Alley database to the index? - the posts where the acronyms first show up are listed in that, together with the number of the original post. Anyone interested could chase them down that way. Most of the theories were generated by the old crowd and many are TBAY related (which I think should be a listed category anyway - MADAM WHIPLASH is hardly the Hermione of the canon. An avid SHIPper searching for past pairings might be bemused at her and Percy playing Dominatrix games in PEPPERMILL instead of the usual slush. But I love it!) Newer posters have independently developed many of the same thought paths but probably haven't bothered to give them titles. Hopefully, by defining every post by category, you won't need to know the acronym to access the general theory, though it could be a useful shortcut *if* you know the acronym. How many do? Yes, I think they should be included in the current 'define post by category', but maybe not in the main search engine once we've finished. I'm all for shuffling them off the main category list into a sub-section if at all possible, but it would be useful if they can be accessed and linked to the main post listings somehow. Whether that is realistic is something else. Exactly which filters would be best and how the threads are shown needs some thinking about. No-one's going to be happy if we don't get it right first time. What sort of time-scale before it has to be addressed? Can Paul advise? Barry From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Thu Apr 29 12:07:26 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:07:26 +0100 Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] - rumour In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: There's a long thread around the 2900 mark based on a wild rumour that Harry is going to be expelled in Book 4. The implications of this are exercising the minds on site - quite entertaining. But since it's all based on inaccurate information coupled with pre-publication hysteria I'm rejecting them all as "off topic". Speculation is one thing, speculation resulting from invalid 'canon' that was probably dreamed up from complete guess-work is something else again. But it is fun to watch theory evolve on the hoof - complete with 'Spoiler' tags. Barry From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Thu Apr 29 12:48:35 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:48:35 -0000 Subject: - rumour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > There's a long thread around the 2900 mark based on a wild rumour that > Harry is going to be expelled in Book 4. > Carolyn: Hope you've marked one or two of the posts down in the 'predictions' section for GOF ? Its a useful place to catch both good and bad rumours. Incidentally, rootling in the files section on the main site yesterday, I found a compiled file of predictions - put up by CindyC, but not apparently put together by her. You get a mention by the way for one of your early posts.. From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Thu Apr 29 13:29:53 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:29:53 -0000 Subject: - is there.. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > ...and yet another going on about the origin of Golden Snitches! "Do they have a larval form?" Before "Quidditch Through the Ages" and not really worth a separate category, I think. Carolyn: aargh..no, definitely not. Just file under quidditch somewhere methinks... > > I've got a feeling that very few of the theory acronyms will be used much, saving a small number that keep recurring, like MAGIC DISHWASHER. > Carolyn: Yes, this is Dicey's view as well. Because it took so long to put them on, I was lazily just leaving them all there, until we got to that part of the list to see what happened. However, now I am dithering about whether to take them all out again in advance. Would save a lot of space on the category list I suppose. > Would it be possible to eventually tie in the Inish Alley database to the index? - the posts where the acronyms first show up are listed in that, together with the number of the original post. Anyone interested could chase them down that way. Carolyn: You mean have a button called something like 'Inish Alley' on the finished site, which is a hotlink taking you straight to that list ? It doesn't sound difficult to do, for them wot knows how to..Paul ?? Any thoughts ? > > Most of the theories were generated by the old crowd and many are TBAY related (which I think should be a listed category anyway - MADAM WHIPLASH is hardly the Hermione of the canon. An avid SHIPper searching for past pairings might be bemused at her and Percy playing Dominatrix games in PEPPERMILL instead of the usual slush. But I love it!) > (etc) Carolyn: Ah, now we differ here. I think that providing TBAY posts are identified as such in their subject line, as a warning to the squeamish, they should take their place amongst the other posts, and be coded up the same way. I wouldn't want them shuffled off anywhere obscure. Essentially, they are just an incisive way of making a point that could have gone in to a normal post. But love the Hermione/Percy dominatrix scenario - haven't seen that one. Must look it out.. Your argument for relegating it to a darkened room would be that it is (probably !) based on very little canon and is nearly fanfic ? Just a more grown up perspective I would briskly argue, and salutary for the SHIPPERS to encounter.. My original reason for piling all the acronyms on to the category list was actually because I found it helpful to find out which ones belonged with which character, and I still think that's a useful thing to know. Also, I was coding up some things a few days ago which were identical to LOLLIPOPS, but preceded it by about eighteen months - I think it is interesting to read that progression, and how a theory name came to define something that a lot of people thought from day 1. I accept that if a theory didn't generate much interest beyond its original outing, it should be downgraded as previously discussed, but I do feel that by the same token, those theories that really became major concepts (such as Magic Dishwasher), should end up with their own category code. Most major theories got discussed in both TBAY and non-TBAY form, and all those responses should surely stay together ? > > Exactly which filters would be best and how the threads are shown needs some thinking about. No-one's going to be happy if we don't get it right first time. What sort of time-scale before it has to be addressed? Can Paul advise? > Carolyn: I suspect that we should begin working on it fairly soon, as it is also a useful way of checking what has been coded under various headings, and making any adjustments before the number of posts becomes too daunting to deal with. From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Thu Apr 29 14:13:43 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 15:13:43 +0100 Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: - rumour In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6C3AA1FF-99E7-11D8-9BBA-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> On 29 Apr 2004, at 13:48, a_reader2003 wrote: > --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith > wrote: > > There's a long thread around the 2900 mark based on a wild rumour > that > > Harry is going to be expelled in Book 4. > > > Carolyn: > Hope you've marked one or two of the posts down in the 'predictions' > section for GOF ? Its a useful place to catch both good and bad > rumours. > Mm. Some of them turned into SHIPping, so I marked them as such. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 666 bytes Desc: not available URL: From paul-groups at wibbles.org Thu Apr 29 15:29:53 2004 From: paul-groups at wibbles.org (Paul Kippes) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: {groups} [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: - is there.. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040429152953.315.qmail@web13807.mail.yahoo.com> --- a_reader2003 wrote: > Would it be possible to eventually tie in the Inish Alley database to the index? - the posts where the acronyms first show up are listed in that, together with the number of the original post. Anyone interested could chase them down that way. Carolyn: You mean have a button called something like 'Inish Alley' on the finished site, which is a hotlink taking you straight to that list ? It doesn't sound difficult to do, for them wot knows how to..Paul ?? Any thoughts ? Me: You can, but I don't see the point. Why do we want to link to the list? Why not just add what the acronym stands for in the category description field? The fields isn't being used, but that's one reason why it's there. Now if we want to show people everything, then yes, link to the list. > Exactly which filters would be best and how the threads are shown needs some thinking about. No-one's going to be happy if we don't get it right first time. What sort of time-scale before it has to be addressed? Can Paul advise? > Carolyn: I suspect that we should begin working on it fairly soon, as it is also a useful way of checking what has been coded under various headings, and making any adjustments before the number of posts becomes too daunting to deal with. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Fri Apr 30 09:08:29 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:08:29 +0100 Subject: Access Message-ID: Locked out again. Page won't open, not even getting as far as Password box. Anyone else having trouble? Barry From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Fri Apr 30 09:33:12 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:33:12 +0100 Subject: Odd, that... Message-ID: <665FACE0-9A89-11D8-BF57-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Paul, a puzzle for you. Tried x number of times to access your page this morning, both from 'Bookmarks' and from the hyperlink in one of your mails, without success. So I closed down my mail service, browser and internet link and re-started. In at my first attempt. Obviously something changed - possibly the chain of servers in the connection. Is this common? Barry From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Fri Apr 30 09:52:43 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:52:43 +0100 Subject: More categories? Message-ID: <2061D52E-9A8C-11D8-BF57-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Two fairly common themes that aren't listed: Underage magic The Basilisk Can they be fitted into the existing structure, or do they deserve their own little spot? Barry From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Fri Apr 30 10:36:39 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:36:39 -0000 Subject: More categories? In-Reply-To: <2061D52E-9A8C-11D8-BF57-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > Two fairly common themes that aren't listed: > > Underage magic > > The Basilisk > Under-age magic is already there under 'law & order' within WW. Have added basilisks under snakes - not strictly correct, but.. NB I had an ouroboros thread yesterday, but put it under alchemy as it seems to be a common concept in that area. Carolyn From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Fri Apr 30 10:46:18 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:46:18 +0100 Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: More categories? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9CAEE39C-9A93-11D8-BF57-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> > > NB I had an ouroboros thread yesterday, but put it under alchemy as > it seems to be a common concept in that area. > Ooh! Not strictly from that era. Mythological - child of Thor (?) along with the Fenris Wolf and Hel. All three expected to have a negative environmental impact come Ragnarok. But you know that. Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 382 bytes Desc: not available URL: From paul-groups at wibbles.org Fri Apr 30 14:07:48 2004 From: paul-groups at wibbles.org (Paul Kippes) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 07:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: {groups} [HPFGU-Catalogue] Access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040430140748.86912.qmail@web13807.mail.yahoo.com> Your IP address changed on me. I just added the new range. --- Barry Arrowsmith wrote: --------------------------------- Locked out again. Page won't open, not even getting as far as Password box. Anyone else having trouble? Barry --------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPFGU-Catalogue/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: HPFGU-Catalogue-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Fri Apr 30 15:50:25 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:50:25 -0000 Subject: More categories? In-Reply-To: <9CAEE39C-9A93-11D8-BF57-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > > > > NB I had an ouroboros thread yesterday, but put it under alchemy as > > it seems to be a common concept in that area. > > > > Ooh! Not strictly from that era. > Mythological - child of Thor (?) along with the Fenris Wolf and Hel. > All three expected to have a negative environmental impact come > Ragnarok. > > But you know that. > > Barry Did you mean Jormungand, child of Loki and Angrboda ? Thor kills the serpent, but dies in the process. A disappointingly cosy world seems to emerge post-Ragnorok, offering no quarter to rabid FEATHERBOAS.. Not sure how far back alchemy goes.. have to look it up. My imaginative source was Eddison. From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com Fri Apr 30 17:10:30 2004 From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (Barry Arrowsmith) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 18:10:30 +0100 Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: More categories? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <489B1B92-9AC9-11D8-BF57-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> I think you looked that up. That's cheating. > > Did you mean Jormungand, child of Loki and Angrboda ? Thor kills the > serpent, but dies in the process. A disappointingly cosy world seems > to emerge post-Ragnorok, offering no quarter to rabid FEATHERBOAS.. > > Not sure how far back alchemy goes.. have to look it up. My > imaginative source was Eddison. > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 465 bytes Desc: not available URL: From carolynwhite2 at aol.com Fri Apr 30 19:01:48 2004 From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (a_reader2003) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 19:01:48 -0000 Subject: More categories? In-Reply-To: <489B1B92-9AC9-11D8-BF57-000A9577CB94@btconnect.com> Message-ID: --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith wrote: > > > I think you looked that up. That's cheating. > I had to re-check, I admit - its a while since I researched it last! BTW, take a look at post 3551.. Carolyn Who often looks like Hel