Merged data

[corinthum]

Carolyn wrote:

> Ok, I worked through the list and just checked each of those posts 
> was coded correctly, sometimes taking away a code, sometimes adding a 
> code - that was what I was supposed to do, right??

Also clueless as to how to access the attachment, I haven't looked at
Paul's list.  The collisions I expected to occur, however, were with
the posts that I had to recode in order to reorganize categories.  My
changes should have mirrored the real database; however, the
"categorized by" property was consequently switched to me rather than
the original categorizer.

> Out of interest, I also checked through the newly merged rejects, and 
> found the total came to about 200 less than it did on Sunday. I had 
> been adding 880 rejects to my total each week, which was the last 
> number Kelly gave me before handing over the dbase to you. Is there 
> anyway of checking how many rejects were on that file that Kelly gave 
> you before merging? 

The rejected posts numbers that I sent you for updates included all
posts I had categorized to date, both before going to sea and while
out there.  If you were getting your numbers from the reject category
[s] lists, then there would be some overlap between my rejects and
yours.  200 sounds about right, actually.

-Kelly