Proposed changes to reject categories - pl. comment
a_reader2003
carolynwhite2 at aol.com
Mon Jul 26 15:38:05 UTC 2004
Now we have been using the reject codes for a while, what do people
think about amalgamating some of the categories? Boyd wants just one
reject button (!), but I think we do need to keep some sub-divisions
in order to answer queries later about why some posts were rejected.
Also, some reject categories may need some sorting out later, and
that is easier to do if there are sub-sets rather than just one huge
group of rejects.
My proposal is:
Put 0.1, 0.3 & 0.11 together:
0.1··ADMIN/list management related
Posts about posting conventions, problems with connections, Yahoo,
administrative projects like FAQs & FP
0.3··Discussing spoiler issues/problems
Conventions to be used preceding the publication of a new book, in
order not to spoil the enjoyment of other readers
0.11··Too illiterate, badly written
This is for posts which are truly unreadable, even with allowances
for English as a second language
Put 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6 together:
0.4 ··Off-topic Chatter
Anything which is not strictly about the book canon
0.5··Listings of personal favourite topics/characters etc Polls,
quizzes, likes & dislikes, anything which has no substantive canon
analysis attached to it but which is merely personal opinion
0.6··Fan-fic-related
All fan-fiction discussion and comment
Put 0.8 and 0.8.2 together
0.8··Adds nothing new
Use this for first statement of questions, where the question is
repeated in subsequent replies. Also use it selectively to ignore
posts that repeat points that are frequently made.
0.8.2····FAQs & their answers
Use selectively in conjunction with 0.8/adds nothing new, where it is
also a FAQ (see HB for guide as to what is a FAQ). Don't use it when
the post seems to be a new contribution to a FAQ (in your judgement),
but code that kind of post up as normal
Put 0.9 and 0.7 together
0.9··Correction of trivial mistake in past post
For posts correcting spelling mistakes, mis-attribution or other
minor errors
0.7··Repeated /duplicated post
For where someone has posted something twice in error
The following three stay as they are:
0.2··Movie-related
Anything to do with the films that does not include a substantive
discussion about the book canon
0.8.1····Mere agreement
For posts which add nothing except agreement with a previous poster
0.10··Mistakes/perpetrating mistakes
Use this when you know that the premise of a post is based on a
mistake over canon including things we now know as a result of OOP,
but which were not known at the time, eg who the `married couple' are
that Sirius referred to in POA.
If we did this, I would want to re-number them all in some logical
way and alter the titles slightly. I'd also need Paul to merge the
categories together as some of them are too big to move the posts one
by one.
Let me know what you think.
Carolyn
PS Paul - is there a way I can count the number of times the main
reject button is ticked? At the moment I am adding up the numbers in
each reject category to get the numbers each week, but I am aware
that that number might be distorted if people have ticked more than
one reject category when rejecting a post.
More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue
archive