[HPFGU-Catalogue] Definitions of categories (wasRe: Opinions, anyone?)

[Barry Arrowsmith]

>
>  Carolyn:
>  If you click the 's' after any of the categories, you will see what
>  has been coded there already.
>
>  So far, there have been relatively few FPs, which is as it should be.
>  I think I have marked Peg Kerr's essays as such, not much else yet.
>
>  Agree, the definition will always be highly personal. My own criteria
>  are mainly 'did it make me think?'; probably depth of
>  thinking/intellectual reference, care in explaining analysis,
>  literacy etc are also factors. Admittedly it would be tough for a
>  SHIPPER to get past these barriers, but if such a post was based on a
>  thoughtful character analysis, it is possible <g>. (Iris_ft writes
>  some very beautiful philosophical ones for example, quite out of the
>  normal shipping league).
>

That's roughly what I thought the situation was.

If you don't object, I'd like to notify the group about any post I come 
across that gets close to FPdom  and see if there's a consensus - that 
way my own personal idiosyncrasies get  diluted somewhat. Of course I 
won't bother doing so when we eventually get to my posts - priceless 
gems of deathless prose, every one of 'em.

Beavering through my allotted posts and there's a thread that's spun 
off from  sex education -  couples, partners, spouses, known and 
unknown etc. Not really SHIPping, it's more a 'family' line - including 
the possibility of Hogwarts staff having unknown partners.
Suggestions?

Barry


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 1656 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://archive.hpfgu.org/pipermail/hpfgu-catalogue/attachments/20040607/a696f973/attachment.bin>