Vampire Snape

[a_reader2003]

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "annemehr" <annemehr at y...> 
wrote:
> While coding, I ran across my first Vampire?Snape post, and the only
> place to put it was right into category 2.3.7 Severus Snape. I think
> we  ought to have a separate category for this question, which is
> obviously going to take up a huge number of posts.
> 
> Useless observation: while clicking on the very useful "p" link, I 
ran across an assumption that the DoM was some sort of "secret agent"
> department, an assumption that I believe ran rampant before OoP. 
I'll have you all know that in 2002 I posted the opinion that it 
carried on secret magical research! Just so you all realise how 
perceptive I am <g>.
> 
> Anne
> back in the saddle again

Carolyn:
Yes, I think Vampire!Snape would be a good idea, I'll do it now. This 
sort of thing may come up quite a lot - eg, should we have ESE!Lupin 
in readiness? (Or in that case will Lupin +ESE be appropriate?).

Clever Anne - a correct prediction. There are some creepily good ones 
about what was in the first prophecy that I've come across as well.

Glad you have used the 'p' feature - I am really pleased about it. I 
very much want that to be the style that members eventually see posts 
when they get to use it, but there seem to be some legal issues 
surrounding this, unfortunately. It will be a pity if all the members 
get to see is a list of  numbers again - better than Yahoo search I 
suppose, but..