A coding question

[a_reader2003]

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "annemehr" <annemehr at y...> 
wrote:
> Post 1319 on the old Club makes predictions for book 4 and in 
general.
>  So far, so good.  It also theorises that Snape had been in love 
with
> Lily.  Now, since this is not a LOLLIPOPS post per se (as LOLLIPOPS
> hadn't even been acronymed yet), I don't code it as a LOLLIPOPS 
post,
> do I?  It would be impossible to do that sort of coding 
consistently,
> since I don't have InishAlley memorised.
> 
> Just checking...
> 
> Anne

Carolyn:
No, only actually LOLLIPOPS goes on that code..and its interesting 
how often the idea had come up before that acronym was invented !