Handwriting analysis

[a_reader2003]

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith 
<arrowsmithbt at b...> wrote:
> Why not 1.4 Characterisation?
> 
> Yeah, I know it's intended for JKR's characterisations but it's 
> possible  to argue that handwriting is an aspect of just that that 
> posters  are uncovering.
> 
> Barry
> 
> 
> On 15 May 2004, at 02:16, corinthum wrote:
> 
> > I came across a short series of posts discussing the handwriting 
of various characters and what it shows.  Right now I've coded the one
response that discussed specific characters in the respective
categories, but I'm unsure what to do with the others.  Suggestions?
> >

Carolyn:
Yes, 1.4 Characterisation is probably the best bet for now. There is 
some stuff that comes up later on applying Myers-Brigg type 
indicators as well. If it these professional approaches (graphology 
etc) get extensive, we could create a category for them under 1.4 if 
you like.