Yet more possible categories/killed 'em off

[carolynwhite2]

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "annemehr" <annemehr at y...> 
wrote:
> 
> First, let's get this category discussion out of the way:
> 
> Post #20607 was someone working out who all the beings might be. 
> Besides having some we have in other categories (e.g. Muggles), he 
has
> a few that we have nowhere at all: Hags, Merpeople, Dwarves (gave 
CoS
> as a reference), Leprechauns and Banshees.  It doesn't seem as if 
we'd
> get too many posts about these (unless there are more about 
Merpeople
> than I remember), so would we just code for them directly into
> "Beings" -- and are they actually all beings? [Note: I merely coded
> this particular post into "Beings", not into the individual ones 
named.]
> 
> Similarly, Post # 20614 mentions Ernie MacMillan, and I couldn't 
find
> him on our list.  I know I have a habit of not finding categories 
that
> are there, but I swear I searched the Hogwarts students three times!
> 
> Killed 'em off: I've finished my batch.  May I please have some 
more?
> 
> Anne

I've had some posts that are similar, and have done the same thing - 
where they talked about little-mentioned beings or beasties, I just 
put them under the main 'Beings' or 'Beasts' header codes, using 
FB&WTFT as reference for which category was appropriate.

I thought that if any individual one of them started to attract many 
posts/threads, we could go back and re-code the ones we had bundled 
away, and pull them out under a new sub-category.

On Ernie, I'll add him, as he does come up from time to time.

Here's some more posts: 22001-22250.

Carolyn