What's the best way of getting people to use this catalogue ?
corinthum
kkearney at students.miami.edu
Sat Oct 30 04:36:18 UTC 2004
Carolyn asked:
> This catalogue should be a great resource to help improve the
quality
> of posting, but only if people enjoy using it, and can use it to
> locate stuff quickly and easily.
...
> Take a difficult category like Snape, for instance - well over 1000
> posts already. Finding what you want is very tricky, although not
as
> bad as having to read 27000 posts, of course.
>
> Also, would like to get your views on the second level edit - how
> tough we should be, what the criteria could be for pruning further..
Regarding use of the catalogue, I really don't think it will be as
difficult as you think to locate posts. After all, most common
questions can be narrowed down to a certain combination of
categories. For example, someone who wants to know if anyone
considered the possibility that Snape was in love with Lily wouldn't
have to search all Snape posts; he or she could search a combination
of Snape, Lily, and RelationSHIPPING, and would find that, why yes,
people have considered this idea. I think that simply providing an
obvious link to our catalogue will be enough.
Perhaps we could provide guidance for the most common questions along
these lines. For example, if someone posted a message discussing
whether Hermione likes Ron or Harry, we could simply reply "Search
the catalogue (http://www.randomcatalogueadress.com) for Trio ships".
As far as the second edit, I still think we should leave as much as
possible. Keep in mind that we cataloguers don't represent the
average HPFGU reader; what seems obvious to us may be very
interesting for others to read. I doubt people will be upset to find
too much on a topic of their interest, as long as it's all in one
place.
-Kelly
More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue
archive