Databases/Chapter summaries/MWPP

[carolynwhite2]

 Ginger:
> I went ahead and gave myself a new section to review. I am taking 
> 3.16.8 through 3.17.2. That's the one with pets through TWT. I put 
> my name in the database. And I did it all by myself. 

Kelly:
Hmm, I thought I had all of 3.16. I'm listed as such in the Wizarding 
World database, but not in the Review Allocations database. 

Carolyn:
Apologies - this is my fault. I wasn't careful enough in updating the 
Review Allocations DB when Kelly said she would do the Hogwarts 
section.

If you don't mind Ginger finishing off the section Kelly, I've 
changed 3.16.8/3.16.9/3.17.1/3.17.2 to Ginger in both DBases now.

Hope there are no further glitches. I would do away with having a two 
DB saying the same thing, but it still seems sort of useful to have 
the Review Allocations DB as it is shorter - but we can ditch it if 
people want, to avoid having to update two tables whenever people 
choose a review section.

*************
KathySnow:
Something else I forgot to ask about; the chapter review summaries 
and questions. I have come across three so far under the Sirius 
heading and questioned if they should actually be there until the 
thread stems off to the degree of talking about Sirius only. 

Carolyn:
I would agree that the chapter summary responses should mainly be 
with the chapter, unless they are significantly about something else, 
in this case, Sirius.

*********

MWPP....

Well, where do people want me to put this code? Under Group Dynamics? 
Just think of all the sections that need to be gone through to make 
sure the right stuff ends up here.

Votes? 
 
 
Carolyn