Coding and Physical types

[corinthum]

Kathy wrote:

> I've come across discusions on physical descriptions and possible 
> meanings. For the time being I've put it under 3.4.3 Physical types 
> and metabolism but it sort of fits under 3.4.6 grooming. Only it 
isn't 
> either. It's a case of how does beauty/ugly fit with magic or 
> expectations. Or "what do the different types of noses mean?"  I'm 
> sure at some point there will be/was a discussion about hair 
> color/magic and height/magic.


I know we're trying not to overcode, but I don't see anything wrong 
with two or three codes on a post, if it needs it.  For your example, 
I'd say 3.4.3 and 3.8.1 Magic ability combined describe the post 
pretty accurately.

And I agree, coding is much easier now that I'm glossing over details 
and just looking for main topics.  Although I'm still probably 
keeping some stuff that is repetitive, since repetition is easier to 
verify during review than during coding.

-Kelly