[HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: Coding TBAYs

[ewe2]

On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 09:33:14PM -0000, CarolynWhite2 wrote:
> 
> Carolyn:
> Erm, I am not sure TBAY is a simple as this. Although the single TBAY 
> code might be sufficient if the post is only in that style and not 
> really to the point about anything much, more likely it should 
> attract some other codes, depending on the theory being discussed.

I think you'll find that in the majority of cases, either you put it
down to the general TBAY cat, or you code for anything up to 4 or 5 theories
on *most* TBAY posts. Even 3 is too much. And as TBAY is really a kind of
commentary on the theories rather than really advancing the theories
themselves (examples please if you disagree), that's appropriate.

I'm more concerned that we don't have a clever/stupid category for Voldemort
as he really is exhibiting signs of Evil Overlord Syndrome. Joking aside,
there IS a thread of intellectual superiority in the Potterverse which JKR
ruthlessly exploits, and perhaps it's worth a cat?

> ::worry::

Chinese worry balls on standby! (New Red Dwarf DVD yay :)

-- 
Windows XP: like KDE, only more annoying!