Prince of Lies/Talisman/Neville

[Talisman]

In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "carolynwhite2"
<carolynwhite2 at a...> wrote:>
> However, we now have a sub-problem. Post 34752 was rejected by
> Talisman on her most recent killing spree. Risking my life, I have
> now un-rejected it, and coded it to Prince of Lies. But there is a
> thread attached to it which has also been rejected, so, erm,
Talisman do you want to revisit and resurrect any of 'em ??
>

Talisman responds:

I don't think you have a sub-problem. 34752 is regurgitation of what
Cindy wrote in 34690, the gist of which had already been reiterated 
in 34728. (Both of which I coded up as keepers, by the way.) It got 
the "adds nothing new" ax because it didn't. Except for the nifty  
name.

I suppose the introduction of a name is sufficient reason to keep
it. Barely. Though I would have coded ONLY to the name myself, the 
rest of it being thrice repetative.

The other posts that I see, which have been axed in that series, are 
merely agreeing (or rather "I can see your point, but I'm not sure") 
or, "Gee,I hope Jo hurries up and tells us."  Unless we are giving 
certain cliques a free pass--under the guise of continuity?--
babbling or no, I'm not inclined to reserect anything.  Let me know 
if you see somethng different.  I'll help you see the error of your 
ways. <g>

If I go back I may whack a few more.  After all, I kept 34749, which 
is all acronym and no theory, only because it introduced 
S.I.S.S.Y.C.O.W.A.R.D.: Sadistic, Immature Severus Snape; Yellow 
Coward, Offensive, With Absolutely Reproachable Demeanor.

Pretty lame as a theory. I thought it was the standard, 
uninsightful,line. But what can you expect from Snape-haters? 

I really only kept it because you had included the acronym in the 
list. So, does coming up with a name or acronym insure retention? 

Talisman