Fanfic/Coding theories/trusting DD..

[corinthum]

Me:

> >>In this past set, there was a thread discussing the merits of 
> fanfiction, and whether it was a valid interpretation of the books 
> and consistent with authorial intent or not. 
> <snip>
> Also, for a quick laugh, read the P.S. in post 38988.<<

Carolyn:

>If 38988 was an example of the thread, there is an argument for 
> coding to 1.3.1.3 What is canon? Amanda's posts are ones where I 
> admit to giving the benefit of the doubt, especially for amusing 
PS's 
> about vampires.

Yes, actually, all of the participants in the thread were posters I 
usually give the benefit of the doubt: Jo Serenadust, Heidi Tandy, 
Amanda Geist, lexicon Steve, Penny Linsenmeyer, and Finwitch.  I 
thought it was an interesting discussion, and I fall into the never-
read-or-have-any-interest-in-reading-fanfiction group.  The thread 
continues into Corinne's set, and she rejected them as well.  I'll 
leave them as rejected for now; but I may go back and change them at 
a later date.

-Kelly