Dbase & other stuff
dungrollin
spotthedungbeetle at hotmail.com
Fri Feb 18 11:02:30 UTC 2005
> Carolyn:
> I would choose some categories and start reviewing. The sooner we
> make a start...
>
> Sorry to inflict this on everyone, but I think it is the right
thing
> to do at this stage.
Can we clarify exactly what we're doing? Are we changing codes as we
review, or making notes? What if we have posts that were coded
before certain categories came into existance? I don't want to start
adding codes and find that I'm messing up somebody else's section by
adding posts while they're in the middle of it.
How about we remove all unnecessary codes (which won't upset anyone
else's categories), but make a list of posts where extra codes
should be added, along with clearer definitions of categories and
potential new categories, to be discussed, and then have a sweep
through adding categories at the end?
Alternatively, we could have an extra category called 'reviewed'
(which could be removed afterwards) that gets ticked for all posts
that have had codes added in this review. Then you can identify the
new posts that turn up in a category that you're working on, and you
don't need to repeat somebody else's work.
Dot
More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue
archive