Character coding, Puffskeins, Sean & Anne

[Jen Reese]

First, welcome Sean! Your tagline makes me crack up every time I 
read it. You're in the right group of lunatics ;).

And Anne, it seems like you've been sick for a long time now; I 
sincerely hope the antibiotics and anemia treatment get you going 
again. After all, you're one of the original coders in this here 
joint, and we need your input. (P.S. I'm going to The Witching Hour 
too and can't wait to meet you in person!).

Now, back to business:

Carolyn:
> Overall, re my responses to these questions, what I think we 
> should do is try and keep the character codes fairly 'pure', in 
> the sense that posts coded to them should be mainly about the 
> character in question, rather than mainly about one of the many 
> meta-themes or WW themes.
> 
> Do others agree?

Jen: Yes. Guilty of overcoding if a name is even mentioned in a 
post, but will stop that. Promise. You start clicking down the list 
and get in a rhythm and hoo-boy before you know it 15 categories are 
tagged. Seems like the best rule of thumb now when considering the 
end user is to look at the big picture and main topic when coding. 
Some posts are hard because they discuss multiple subjects, but it's 
not going to be perfect after all. *L.O.O.N's stiffen at the 
possibility of a heretic in the group.* Well, it's *true*. We'll 
always be able to go back and correct if needed. It's all good :).

As for Puffskeins, might as well add a category. If we end up with 
too few posts at the end, we can integrate them back into another 
category.

Slacker!Jen who promises to start her review of the chapters 
posthaste and will report back when she's done. Thankfully they are 
either right, wrong, or rejected. NO ambiguity, NO gray area, NO 
discussion *sigh of relief*.