Hermione/Bill/The Weasleys

[carolynwhite2]

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Sean Dwyer <ewe2 at a...> wrote:

I notice the general Weasleys catalogue isn't in the database
Carolyn, would a review be in order there? 90% of the Bill posts 
included that cat and I noticed repeats of all the other Weasleys 
where a general Weasleys  would be more appropriate.

Carolyn:
As you notice later, the general Weasley category is 1.4.7.1 under 
Family dynamics. I have just de-cluttered the Gred & Forge category 
on the same principle - ie, only code to the twins where it really is 
a detailed discussion about them, rather than their family 
relationships.

Sean:
Back to that Granger person then. Does anyone else find Miss Whiplash 
as insensitive as half the List?

Carolyn:
I was thinking of awarding you a medal, like Ginger, for tackling 
this section; I can see a backlash is setting in already. Personally 
I find her only a little less revolting than Molly, whom she closely 
resembles - lucky for Ron then, he can fulfill the stereotype if the 
inevitable pairing comes off. The more interesting question, IMO, is 
what does this say about JKR's outlook on life.

Sean:
> Well, instead of doing my Granger, I've been naughty and started on 
Arthur Weasley, and although I know technically 1.4.7.1 Weasleys is 
under "Family Dynamics" the tendency to code for individual Weasleys 
when considered as a group (either in terms of their internal 
relationships, or more often as an example of having red hair for 
instance), drives me to recode under 1.4.7.1 where at least general 
Weasley stuff can be picked up. It might also be fairly said that 
1.7.4.1 Weasley age gaps under the general Timelines header, is a 
fair subject in itself, and should be a sub-category of Weasleys. 
Occam's Razor made me do it (why code for 2 or 3 when you can code 
for 1 :))

Carolyn:
I quite like this idea of moving the Weasley ages/age gap 
controversies under Weasley family dynamics - what do other people 
think?