rejecting posts

[potioncat]

Just a quick observation. I'm going slower than most of you. Once the 
database was tweeked to get posts in order, the numbers changed. For 
example, if you were already on post 50 when the change happened, the 
first 49 posts may not be the same. Mine were very different.

Also, if you delete a post that affects someone else, it will change 
their numbers. Even if the post is flagged with the review code, it 
will affect the order of a list. Maybe this isn't as significant as I 
think it might be. What do you think? I'm keeping a list of post-
numbers as well as the number it was within the category.

So far if I've found a post that should be deleted, I've noted that 
in the notes section at the bottom but have not deleted it yet. 
(Except for one which only had one code to begin with.)

In the opposite direction, I have a McGonagall post that should be 
under relationship but isn't.  It's also very speculative and my 
instinct would be to reject it. I'm not sure Ginger would agree.  
Again, if I decided to add that code, it would affect Ginger's list.
Would it make sense in that case to tag 5.6 for someone to look at it 
later with a note about recoding?

What will the finished catalogue look like to the clients? Will they 
have a list of headings to click, sort of like we do? Or will they 
enter keywords?

Kathy, who has to help her daughter make Victorian Sponge but would 
rather go buy it like the character in "Calendar Girls" did.