[HPFGU-Catalogue] Review of 1.3.1.1. Constraints Due To Genre

[Sean Dwyer]

On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 04:10:38AM -0000, Talisman wrote:

> The last is the only question provoking aspect.  I added code 4.1.2. 
> where the writer was arguing pro/con kiddie lit; but, did not if 
> they just discussed parameters under the assumption that HP series 
> is one or the other.  We'd just have to code everything there, as 
> falling to one side or the other, if we're assigning assumptions. 
> Opinions?

I have the same problem currently with Trelawney (note the 'e' Carolyn :)) and
general talk of prophecy/predictions, she's coded on both sides. This won't go
away, it'll probably get worse. But I'm still ruthlessly pruning
non-Trelawney-centric posts, just because she's mentioned in connection with a
general discussion, the multiposts particularly.

Likewise I expect the kiddie lit argument itself to get bigger. I agree if the
argument is specifically kiddie lit. to code, but using the argument to talk
generally doesn't merit it.

-- 
"You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."