UPDATE for MEG, 1st March
Jen Reese
stevejjen at earthlink.net
Sun Feb 27 23:31:57 UTC 2005
Carolyn:
> The coding progress has slowed in the last week as the group is
> engaged in a complete review of all the posts so far categorised.
Our
> main conclusion is that individual posts have been classified to
too
> many categories, making sections less focused than we had
expected.
> It is a simple process to put this right, but the review is likely
to
> take a further week or so before we can continue coding.
Jen: Aack--tell me we have longer than a week or so to finish
reviewing and this is your "best case scenario" prediction for MEG,
right CW? Even with no alcohol, a fresh batch of Diet Coke and
tootsie pops, my reviewing speed is, *ahem* less than blistering.
Could I get a pay-raise?
What is the trick I'm missing? Sean whips through posts like a hot
knife through butter, but it seems the more I do, the more that
needs to be done. Like if I keep post A coded to a chapter, well a
couple of posts up and down the thread that *didn't* get coded need
to be added for thread continuity. Or an entire thread is coded to a
chapter, but really only the first two posts pertain to it. Where is
my trusty sword? I used to slice and dice with great abandon, back
in the day....
It finally happened...I'm a LOON. Look for my LOON-like proposal on
chapter coding once I put a stake in GOF.
Jen, reaching for Carolyn's aforementioned ice-pack and wondering if
she's making this too hard, and whether it's time to chuck it all
and try Kneasy's four basic food groups....
More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue
archive