Some new definitions
dungrollin
spotthedungbeetle at hotmail.com
Fri Jun 24 12:52:44 UTC 2005
Deep sighs of contentment are heard across the ether. Dungrollin
(for it is she) lies back in her hammock sipping fresh pineapple
juice, rolls another cigarette, and gazes at the forest still
dripping from last night's storm. For yes, at last, she has
submitted her overly-long thesis, and returned to her African lair
(where the rain is proper rain, the sunshine is proper sunshine, and
the internet connection is slooow). Having recovered from the
inevitable sleep-loss which accompanies printing, binding and
submitting, she returns her attention to the laptop and begins to
type.
Numbers of posts in categories may be out of date will sort the
new posts that have been added once new definitions are in place.
3.5.2.2 Squibs (80 when review started, up to something else, now
down to 51)
Current definition:
"This topic could overlap with 3.5.2 (Purebloods & half bloods);
remember to code also to individual characters discussed"
I disagree with this cross-coding to character bit.
There is much cross-coding with Filch and Mrs Figg which is entirely
unnecessary. If the point is about Squibs, code to squibs, if it is
about character, code to character, it should be rare to code to
both.
Much cross-coding for "You know, I think Petunia might be a
squib!!" Or "Mr and Mrs Evans were squibs!!" same thing, leave
them under the character codes unless the point is really about
squibs.
Much cross-coding with WW lifespans, genetics and populations
estimates. Genetic theories don't need to be coded here.
New definition:
"Posts about what squibness is, and what it means for WW society.
Speculative theories as to Harry's/Petunia's/Neville's/Mr&Mrs
Evans's squibness should be coded under character unless the post
discusses squibness in detail."
3.8.2.2 Life Debts (83 down to 56)
Old definition:
"What obligations these impose, how they come about"
New definition:
"What obligations these impose, how they come about. Theories
involving speculative life-debts should be coded to
characters/acronyms."
3.8.3 Wands (303, down to 215)
Old definition:
"What they do, what they are made of, how they choose the
wizard/witch etc. Include discussions of specific character's
wands"
New definition:
"What they do, what they are made of, how they choose the
wizard/witch etc. Only in-depth discussions of specific
character's
wands. Try to keep separate from 1.2.13.4 (Symbolism: wood) as far
as possible."
3.8.3.1 Wandless magic (46, down to 32)
No old definition
New definition:
"Discussion of uncontrolled magic before attending Hogwarts, as well
as intentional wandless magic, don't forget chapter codes for
specific instances."
If nobody objects, I shall put these new definitions into the
database (3. Wizarding World).
3.8.1 Magical ability
3.8.2 General properties & types of magic (262)
In progress, new definitions on their way...
3.8.2.1 Ancient Magic
"What is it, examples of"
I wrote (ages ago)
Almost all posts in this category are also coded to one of the
following:
1.3.5.1 Godric's Hollow/Death of Lily & James
3.5.4 Blood protection
Seems to be quite tempting to add Ancient Magic to discussions of
the first two, so stuff discussing Lily's sacrifice or
Harry's
protection at the Dursleys' I'd like to take out of this
category
(leaving in 1.3.5.1 and 3.5.4). I think it should really be a subset
of 3.8.2 (Gen. Properties and types of magic) so general
discussions about magic go into 3.8.2, and only those which
significantly discuss ancient magic (rather than just mention it)
get coded under 3.8.2.1.
Carolyn then changed 3.5.4 Blood protection at privet drive
to "Blood protection at privet drive/Lily's sacrifice".
What I want to know is if I can uncode a load of the Godric's Hollow
codes when what is being discussed is Lily's sacrifice and the blood
protection. Shouldn't the Godric's Hollow category be more about
discussions of the incident rather than it's results?
My internet really is slow here. Most pages are ok, but it takes a
good 30 seconds for the category list to load each time I move to a
new post, which makes re-coding a pain in the whatsit. Any tips?
Dot
Trying to be relaxed and calm, but really *extremely* cross that the
Radio 4 listen again page doesn't appear to work from here, and so
she's missing I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue. $#*@\%!
More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue
archive