ESE!food for thought

[potioncat]

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "quigonginger" 
<quigonginger at y...> wrote:
> We now have 89 ESE posts and 6 good.  I haven't moved anything.  They 
> are still as they were originally coded.  Just thought you might find 
> the following stats interesting.  There is a margin of error of +/- 1 
> as I had to guess on a couple due to unclear attribution.



Kathy W:
I'm not sure I see the problem. I think ESE!Lupin is very familiar 
topic to the list in general. Wouldn't a new acronym confuse the issue? 
89 is a lot of posts, but it is a big topic, so it's not unreasonable. 
I thought that "good" was generally a part of ESE, since it was usually 
a counter argument. ESE!McG is a much smaller topic, but I had both in 
that heading. Do all the ESE! have to be Pipppin's to be valid? 

If you want to, you could code a couple of them to the heading for 
Alicia or Katie; they're both down to 0. Lots of room there!

On the other hand, if you're coding to ESE!food, I'd vote for both 
cockroach clusters and blood lollipops for that heading.