1.2.7.7

[carolynwhite2]

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith 
<arrowsmithbt at b...> wrote:
> 
> I'm about  half-way through this bunch - War and Military strategy -
 
> only 39 posts in the category, but I'm thinking that many don't 
deserve 
> to be there.
> 
> A mention of the forthcoming battle with Voldy or discussing who 
can't 
> be trusted to stay loyal doesn't gel with my idea of the category 
> heading.
> 
> Just what are the criteria for this one?
> 
> 
> Barry

Oh, ok - I took a look at this section last week, but did not 
implement my comments because I thought best to wait and see what 
happened to the rest of the section. As you can see there was only 
one short thread which I thought was really on topic (the Grey Wolf, 
Pip one). The other major one could be left under Good & Evil if you 
like, don't feel that strongly about it.

Here's my message again:



Carolyn:
Well, I got off lightly on this one - only 39 posts.

I thought at first this was going to be another section that had to
be canned, but there turned out to be two interesting threads:

1) started by Cindy on the pros and cons of the people batting for
the good side vs the bad side. Really, though, this turned into
arguments about which characters were likely to go bad. It was all
cross-coded to the main good vs evil heading, and perhaps it belongs
there - not quite sure though; useful to have these kind of analyses
pulled out separately.

2) superbly on-topic exchange between Grey Wolf, Pip and Pippin about
the nature of the tactics to be used in the next war.

So, on balance, keep the category (cleaned up to around 25 posts) -
and put it, as proposed, within the plot development section, as it
gives plenty of pointers as to things that might happen.