Chapter Coding Proposal
corinthum
kakearney at comcast.net
Sun Mar 6 00:59:58 UTC 2005
Jen wrote:
> I finished reviewing PS chapter coding and am about halfway through
> COS. I think I've done enough to make a proposal for future coding:
>
> 1) Coding to the First Category, the Book Title. This is the spot
> for general book reviews and for posts touching on 3 or more
> chapters in a given book. That's an entirely arbitrary number on my
> part, but typically if a post is using multiple chapter examples, it
> starts straying into the territory of reviewing the book.
>
> This one is a judgement call, of course. If all the examples are
> relevant but there's no connection made between them, it's better to
> code to individual chapters.
>
> 2) Coding to Chapters. So far, almost every chapter has a seminal
> event discussed ad nauseam which has become synonymous with the
> chapter. Examples: 'The Mirror of Erised' and the socks; 'Quidditch'
> and Snape saving Harry's life; 'Through the Trapdoor' and discussion
> about the tasks/DD's agenda. Readily identifiable events where most
> people can tell you *exactly* what chapter they occurred in.
>
> In light of this pattern, I left threads about very specific events
> coded to the chapter headings. I think people interested in
> Dumbledore and his socks will naturally tend to click on 'The Mirror
> of Erised' chapter code as a logical entry point for discussion.
How are you planning to deal with the graveyard scene in GOF? This
scene covers three chapters but in my mind qualifies as a "very
specific event". I had trouble deciding whether to code to chapters
(and in the end I did check all three) when I came across the thread
discussing sexual overtones in the graveyard scene.
-Kelly
More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue
archive