UPDATE, Sunday, March 6th

[carolynwhite2]

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "potioncat" 
<willsonkmom at m...> wrote:
> 
> In reviewing McGonagall, I've determined these posts ought to be 
> rejected. However, they have codes that "belong" to other 
reviewers. 
> Some of these I'm sure will agree and maybe for a few, the post 
will 
> earn a "keep" status. So I've removed the McGonagall code, added 
both 
> 5.6 and reject.
> 
> 
> Where a previous coder had checked reject & 5.6 leaving only 
> McGonagall, I completly rejected it. Or if an unclaimed catagory 
> remainded, I also went ahead and rejected it.
> 
> So...how should I proceed both with these posts and the ones I'm 
> about to tackle?
> 

Carolyn:
Oh, I understand now how it happened. I thought there must be a 
reasonable explanation, as you are really very careful usually (!)

The simple answer to both these situations is never to click a reject 
sub-code+reject button if there is any other code still left on the 
post after you have removed your McGonagall code (or whatever 
category you are dealing with).

If, in your view, the post should finally be rejected by the person 
who removes whatever remaining categories are left, then by all means 
put a note in the textbox to say so (and tick 5.6 for review), but 
don't click the reject boxes yourself.

Hope this makes sense - sorry if the confusion arose from anything I 
said before.

Carolyn