Catching up ...
quigonginger
quigonginger at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 8 14:52:28 UTC 2005
Kathy (potioncat)
> >But I've read a few posts that really could be rejected, yet three
> or four or more people >have to read the same post and decide on
> their topics before it happens. One today was >about 4 sentences
> long, with 4 codes. It seems a shame not to just wack away at it.
> >Unfortunately, you don't know if someone has looked at it and is
> coming back or if you >are the first to look at it.
>
> Talisman: I vote: whack the suckers. If it readily appears that
> the post is a reject, why make anyone else look at it again? (You
> know that if YOU want to whack it, I want to whack it.)
>
> This is especially true of those one paragraph posts that have been
> coded to 16 headings and don't say anything. If someone (and I
want
> names) is "coming back" (presumably to add codes?) let the perp
> resuscitate the corpse. It will still be there.
Now Ginger:
AMEN SISTER! WHACK! WHACK! WHACK!
Sorry, I've been in the General section of Shipping too long.
I have whacked ruthlessly any posts that say "Harry and Herm would be
so cute." regardless if they were coded to Harry and Herm as well. I
don't wish to put those coders through the saccharine jolt I'm
becoming accustomed to.
On the other hand, if they say something else that may well be worth
saving, then I just uncode ships and add a 5.1.6. Handy little
device.
On a related topic, I thought I had sent in a message earlier, but it
hasn't come through, so I'll repeat myself. Sorry if the original
shows up.
In the new lineup, the category "General" replaces the
old "RelationSHIPPING". It is a little odd to see a category just
called "General". My first response was "General what?" and I was
the one coding it. Could we change that to "General Ship" or
something like that, so that it reflects the idea of Shipping?
It's good to be back. I just about went nuts this weekend without
the coding. I found I had forgotten what it was I used to do for
fun. I read a book instead. The plot went over my head as usual,
but the humour was good.
Toodles, Ginger
More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue
archive