The Gilderoy Lockhart Report (*flourish*)

[corinthum]

Carolyn:

> <My thoughts on the above are:
> - DADA appointment policy; could be worth keeping some if they 
> include any reasonable analysis of GL's actual 
character/suitability 
> for job (or not)>

Eva:

> Most don't; but they have made me wonder if we don't need a 
separate 
> category for that general discussion about DADA and other 
> appointments. It does keep popping up with the regularity of 
> clockwork. Does it go under the general heading of 'Teachers', 
> perhaps? Lots will have ended up under 'Snape', too, and 
> under 'Trelawney'. I wouldn't want those posts to get lost 
somewhere; 
> but they mostly don't belong under GL because they do no more than 
> mention his name. Actually, some don't even do *that* (honest!).

There is already a category for this: 3.16.7.6 DADA.  At least, in my 
review, I deemed discussion of the DADA post and Dumbledore's 
questionable ability to fill it a suitable topic for this category.   
I'm almost done the 3.16.7 review; it should be completed this 
weekend at the latest.

-Kelly