Even more replies

[KathyK]

Carolyn:
>> The best thing is to leave the character codes well alone, and 
just concentrate on the Family dynamic group that you are dealing 
with.  This is because lots of other people have been through the 
characters by now, and decided what they want to keep and what to 
chuck, so the character code should be mainly there for a reason. 
[Not all characters have been done yet, so this won't always be the 
case, but Weasleys have been done, as have muggles].<<

KathyK:

I managed to make myself wholly unclear.  ::pats herself on the 
back:: Good Job, Kath.  

No problem with keeping to the family dynamics side of things.  I 
asked about the character codes in conjunction really more with an 
eye on future coding for my own edification.  My tendency has been 
to code just to a particular Group Dynamic, again like the Weasleys, 
and leave it at that.  From looking over this category I can clearly 
see not everyone has been coding posts this way.  

What I meant to say:

When we get back to coding and have a post that I code to Such and 
Such a Group Dynamic, would you also like me to code the characters 
as I have not done so in the past?

KathyK