Characters' Ages & Re: Weasley Age Gaps

[potioncat]

> Kathy W before:
> 
> I took action on the Weasley Age Gap posts 1.2.12.1:
> Was 109 now 36. Some of these are only coded to the one heading, some 
> have other codes as well. Many of these are already coded to Weasleys.
> 
> In that number I completely rejected  a little over 20 posts.
> 
> Why don't we leave it be until I sort out 1.12.1 Calculating 
> Characters' Ages? That way, whatever we do with ages will be 
consistent.

Kathy W. now.
With about 40 more posts to review, I can say this: When all is said 
and done, there will only be around 50-65 posts left under 1.2.12 
Calculating Charcters' Ages. (out of 190) You can only read why 
Hermione had to have been born in 1980 or had to have been born in 1979 
so many times.

Most posts fall under a specific character or several characters, 
others fall under Hogwarts Admission Policy/British school policy.

So, either of these would work in my opinion:
Keep 1.2.12 but do not cross code to character. Any catalogue user who 
needs  this code can scan through the subject headings to get the posts 
they are interested in. 

Get rid of the code number 1.2.12, keeping the code to the character or 
school policy for that post.

I recommend the latter. And if we follow that line, I'd suggest merging 
the 1.2.12.1 Weasley age gaps into the Weasley Dynamics.

Carolyn, once that decision is made, I may need to check a few posts 
before we do a massive change.
Kathy W.
My computer is moving incredibly slowly.....I think because of a 
program my daughter is running. So I'm not sure when I'll be able to 
take more action on the posts.