Psychological assessments and Food
potioncat
willsonkmom at msn.com
Mon Oct 3 12:37:07 UTC 2005
> Ginger's input:
>
> When I first started coding, anything that seemed to be related to
one's psychological makeup went under psych. Then I realized that
about half of what I was coding there would have been better served
under characterazation. At that point, I started reserving Psych for
posts about actual Psych diagnoses. I could be very wrong about
that, so input from others would be welcome from me too.
Kathy W:
I thought the psychological assessments was for those posts that ask:
Do you think Sirius is depressed? Is Snape/Harry/Trevor suffering
from PTSD? or any other such topic.
Kneasy maintained those posts said more about the person writing the
post than about the character.
>Miss H:
> After considering it from several angles, Miss H decides to seek
> clarification:
>
> - so, no posts at all about chewing gum or chocolate frogs as food
> items? Magical cooking and diet become 3.13.2 and 3.13.3
respectively?
Kathy W:
Well, that's what I thought we said. Right now there are no posts in
Droobles or in Frogs. Do we want to keep them for use only as a
discussion of the sweet, or do we want to combine them into Sweets?
I'm actually surprised we haven't seen any posts about cockroach
clusters or blood lollipops.
If we are keeping them, I would change the one to "Chocolate Frogs"
rather than "Chocolate Frog Cards".
More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue
archive