Psychological assessments and Food

potioncat willsonkmom at msn.com
Mon Oct 3 12:37:07 UTC 2005


 
> Ginger's input:
> 
> When I first started coding, anything that seemed to be related to 
one's psychological makeup went under psych.  Then I realized that 
about half of what I was coding there would have been better served 
under characterazation.  At that point, I started reserving Psych for 
posts about actual Psych diagnoses.  I could be very wrong about 
that, so input from others would be welcome from me too.
 

Kathy W:
I thought the psychological assessments was for those posts that ask: 
Do you think Sirius is depressed? Is Snape/Harry/Trevor suffering 
from PTSD? or any other such topic. 

Kneasy maintained those posts said more about the person writing the 
post than about the character. 


>Miss H:  
> After considering it from several angles, Miss H decides to seek 
> clarification:
> 
> - so, no posts at all about chewing gum or chocolate frogs as food 
> items? Magical cooking and diet become 3.13.2 and 3.13.3 
respectively?

Kathy W:
Well, that's what I thought we said. Right now there are no posts in 
Droobles or in Frogs. Do we want to keep them for use only as a 
discussion of the sweet, or do we want to combine them into Sweets? 
I'm actually surprised we haven't seen any posts about cockroach 
clusters or blood lollipops.

If we are keeping them, I would change the one to "Chocolate Frogs" 
rather than "Chocolate Frog Cards".







More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue archive