Psychology/POV/Sweets/Clothes/Vampires/Pronunciation

[carolynwhite2]

Miss H unlocked the catalogue office door and was startled to find a 
hive of industry, after the echoing silence at the weekend. No one 
had answered her query, but industriously had put their own up on the 
blackboard.

*********
Jen:
I'm about halfway through this category and want to make sure I'm on 
the right track. My dilemma is characterization vs. psychological 
assessments. 

(& subseqently) If no one objects, though, I'll go with 
Ginger/Potioncat and stick the bulk of the posts in 
characterizaltion, leaving only the more formalized posts for psych 
assessment.

Kathy W:
Kneasy maintained those posts said more about the person writing the 
post than about the character.

C - Yep, Ginger & Potioncat are right, go with the very narrow 
definition, if nothing else for Kneasy's sanity. If poked with a 
sharpish stick he may be induced to produce case studies illustrating 
state of mind of said posters.
**********
Anne:
I have amended the [POV section] definition to make it "Don't forget 
to click the character as well in cases where it is NOT Harry 
Potter." Otherwise we have a great deal of redundancy as almost all 
POV posts are about Harry's POV, and I have been uncoding HP in these 
*unless* they also contain fresh character analysis of Harry. Which 
means I've been uncoding most of them.


C - thanks Anne. I said to him offlist ages ago that I'd do the 
definitions for his sections, but it is one of the things I have not 
got to yet. 
********
Kathy:
If we are keeping them, I would change the one to "Chocolate Frogs" 
rather than "Chocolate Frog Cards".

C - No, let's not keep them. Confusing I think. I will delete and re-
number the other sections.

*******
KathyW:
At the moment the two headings still exist. Should I re-code the 
uniform posts into the clothing heading? And once that is done, 
Carolyn, could you delete Uniforms 3.16.09 and Rename 3.11.1 to WW 
Clothing and Uniforms?

C - no, I can just merge one into the other, then adjust the name of 
the heading.

****

Anne:
Eh? I know I posted once or twice speculating on the status of
Vampires in the WW based on the availability of Blood Lollipops in
Honeydukes. Must have been considered not catalogue-worthy. *pout*

C - never mind. I still think Snape's a vampire, so there.

***********
Sean:
4.1.1.1 and 4.1.1.2 are together so often I wonder that they are 
separate at all. 

C - so, should we merge them?? Also, did you bin most of the Hermione 
pronunciation discussions ? Hope so.


Carolyn
Having to lie down in a darkened room this week owing to ODing on 
Archers' excitement. Have reached the stage where both sets of 
parents and the whole village find out.

Have to apologise - have been listening to this soap for 35 years, 
and ashamed to admit I can remember Ed and Em being *born*. Its a bit 
like Kneasy watching the golf..just ignore me. Oh, you just did. See 
if I care.