Catching up..
dungrollin
spotthedungbeetle at hotmail.com
Thu Sep 8 09:43:31 UTC 2005
--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Barry Arrowsmith
<arrowsmithbt at b...> wrote:
> No matter what folk like Attwood say, over the past 20-30 years SF
has mutated into a legion of sub-classes, some very subtle indeed.
> Dismissive references to talking squid and rocket-ships merely
> highlights her personal (and oh, so limiting) snobbery. Mind you,
> she's got a hell of a cheek, 'cos she's a repeat offender. Oryx
and Crake (very mundane, out-dated and unoriginal by SF standards)
was preceded by The Handmaiden's Tale - a theme well within the
ambit of the SF dystopian society sub-set.
Dot:
Yeah... but they *are* bloody well-written. I loved Oryx and Crake.
I think the difficulty with SF for many people is that it's so rare
to get brilliant ideas in a brilliantly-written book. Far too often
one ends up having to choose between the ideas and the writing,
which is why I tend to avoid SF unless someone recommends a book
specifically. I'll never forget the experience of reading The
Hadmaid's Tale, after the first few chapters thinking: "Oh, surely
not..." and a few chapters later "Has this not been done to death?"
and yet being quite unable to stop myself reading, enjoying every
second and being a complete convert by the time I turned the last
page. I'll forgive her second-hand ideas for the sheer pleasure of
reading.
Barry:
> It's becoming more difficult to draw hard-and-fast dividing lines
on what is/isn't a particular genre. Exotic backgrounds sometimes
seem to be invented just to excuse an exploration of ideas or
attitudes - like Ursula Le Guin's The Left Hand of Darkness -
attitudes towards sexuality as experienced by a visitor to a society
where all the inhabitants are of the same sex, or Maria Doria
Russell's The Sparrow; some find that one very disturbing and
thought-provoking indeed. A quality rarely found in so-
called 'mainstream' literature these days.
>
Dot:
Ah, I knew I'd read something you'd recommended. The Sparrow, yes.
Nice ideas, and an interesting read for an atheist. Didn't go a
bundle on the prose, and it was too long, but I read it, and enjoyed
it enough to recommend it to someone else. Isn't there a sequel? Is
it more of the same?
Barry
> OK. It'll go on the list for the next time I order a load of
books. (Getting more frequent; I'm averaging 12 - 15 new books a
month from Amazon [non-fiction - generally about half the order - is
too damned expensive anywhere else] plus whatever I happen to come
across in charity shops, plus regular raids on an SF specialty
bookshop in Brum, plus weekly library visits. I've run out of
bookcase space long since; now I'm running out of floor-space as
well. I blame it on the TV companies for pushing out an incessant
load of tripe.)
Dot:
You lucky... Oh why won't somebody pay me to read books all day
every day? Put 'The Origins of Virtue' (Matt Ridley) on your non-
fiction list then, it's a beautifully constructed argument that
altruism is a part of human nature. Everyone should read it.
Thanking Carolyn for the other recommendations - always good to have
a list to get through...
Dot
(The viva, in case anyone cares, was fine. Rather anticlimactic, in
the event, considering the blood-chilling terror beforehand. Now
recovered from over-celebrating, and getting back to work.)
More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue
archive