Harry category changes/Snape suggestion

[annemehr]

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "potioncat" <willsonkmom at m...>
wrote:
>
>  Carolyn:
> > Anyway, I will post a suggested structure for the Snape category 
> > shortly, and perhaps we can discuss it? Otherwise, I fear he will 
> > take someone six months to deal with, and we really can't proceed 
> > until he's done..
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> 
> 
> Kathy W:
> Other than group dynamics and Snape, what is left? Group dynamics has 
> around 1200 posts, but it's divided into clear sections. With numbers 
> as low as 8 and as high as 360. Ginger and I are working on them, 
> taking one section at a time. 
> 
> With 2600 posts, it doesn't seem right or reasonable for one person to 
> do it. I think dividing it up would work, but we may need some sort of 
> guidelines so that we aren't bumping into each other. Can you sort it 
> so that a reviewer has a batch of posts with full reign on all Snape 
> codes? Or would you divide it up by codes? The former may be a bit 
> disjointed as to the categories, but the latter has several reviewers 
> reading the same post.
> 
> Either way, I'm game....slow, but game.
>


Anne:
[I ought to have mentioned, I am currently doing the Arabella Figg
category (fewer than 200 posts; nice and simple). I did put my name in
the database.]

Anyway, it's the main Snape category that's the problem.  The
tentative idea for that would be to assign chunks of it to several
people who would then quickly sort them into the relevant
subcategories (or decode the obvious misfits).  Stage II of the
process would then be that people could take a subcategory and review
it more carefully -- a much less daunting task than trying to do 2600
at once.

Re Harry:
Carolyn, when I looked yesterday, there was no category under "Harry's
training, protection, powers" for the Occlumency lessons.  Is that an
oversight, or did you mean to leave it out?

If you do put it in, my suggested title, "Occlumency," is of course no
good at all, since there will (of course) be a section with that name
under "general properties and types of magic" or whatever it's called
-- better name the Harry section "Harry's Occlumency lessons" or
something like that.

Anne