group dynamics and Re:Snape

[potioncat]

> Ginger:
>   Waddya mean not a single thread?  I did a whole chapter review 
that didn't contain one single reference to Snapeypoo!  Just some 
lovely shipping.  Ah, romance that doesn't involve sweets.  And I did 
a filk too.  No Snapey there, either.  
>    
>   Ginger, still at it on relating to the Muggle world.


Kathy W.
Well, last time I visited HPfGU before coming to the office the 
entire screen was posts about Snape. Of course, after I posted I went 
over and saw a few other topics on screen.

As I've gone through and started removing the Weasley code, I've 
noticed a trend. Once we start coding again, we should use the 
dynamics code for posts about groups or about the interaction within 
the group. Rarely would there also be a code for an individual, but 
it would happen from time to time. In some cases, although several 
individuals are mentioned, the post will really be about one 
individual, not the group. Go with your gut instinct on it.

The other code I've seen a lot today is the "review" code. Carolyn, 
will we have to go through that one before we open the doors? In a  
couple of cases, I actually went ahead and rejected the post. I know, 
I know, I shouldn't have....

Potioncat, humming "Who put the fun in...."