A Snape Suggestion

carolynwhite2 carolynwhite2 at aol.com
Sun Mar 19 19:50:15 UTC 2006


--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, Ginger <quigonginger at ...> 
wrote:
>

> 
> Anne:
> Actually, we still will have to play secretary, because while this
> preliminary review is going on, no one can uncode any of the posts. 
> The reason for this is, say you are reviewing Snape posts 500 - 600,
> and someone starts uncoding posts before yours -- then suddenly, 
what had been the 500th Snape post becomes the 400-and-somethingth 
one and you will lose your place.
> 
> Ginger again:
>    
>   Good preemptive strike, Anne.  
>   It could still be done if we assign it by message #s instead of 
post numbers.  For example, rather than saying "you do the first 100" 
say "you do 233CLUB through 5433CLUB" and the next person takes 
5439CLUB through 234GROUP".  I'm pulling numbers out of the air here, 
but you get the idea.


Miss H, head bound up and full of flu agrees, alas. The only way 
would be to download all the Snape numbers onto a spreadsheet, and 
then issue batches of them, 100 or 500 at a time, whatever.




>    
>   I am planning to finish Law and Order this weekend.
>    

All those senators, Congress, Rumsfeld... not a chance against Ginger 
the invincible.. will you be on CNN, holding the nation to ransom? :)
 		










More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue archive