Too Much Snape Is Never Enough

[ewe2]

Jen:
*Pauses to wonder if the daring penguin solved the tech problems or
if the silence from Miss is a Very Bad Sign*.

I fear the same, Jen. I hope she turns up in time for the *next*
Fforde book, I've already read the Fourth Bear, and it's back to the
tales of Miss H next year *sigh*. If she took me literally and ditched
AOL, she may be in the throes of setting up with a new ISP.

But to the task at hand! Today I reviewed 1000 Snape posts and to my
shock and chagrin could only de-Snape 24 of them! My congratulations
to the coders, reviewers and not least the posters for the most
concentrated potion of TBAY, Fantastic Elkin posts (zomg the size of
them), and all-round tenacious threaded Snapeology!!

It's hard for me to admit, but for hundreds of posts, there wasn't a
useless one. I'd venture to suggest that a good 50% of the best of the
list is here, and we really have a problem now about redundancy. I
cannot see how much further we can take several of the Snape-related
arguments/theories after this lot. I certainly don't think we need yet
another take on the Neville/Snape relationship, but the Sirius/Snape
one has yet to run its course at this point of cataloguing.  I kept
many threads for historical and predictive reasons (particularly
Snape/Dumbledore), and I think this table will be very useful in
helping us weed out future posts relating to Snape. I think Debbie and
Ginger may find more rejectable posts than I did, I seem to have run
into the main drift of golden posts.

There are 4 blocks of Snape left, which I may or may not polish off
after dinner, depending on how long the shopping expedition takes. The
question of my sanity is moot: either Snapeposts drove me mad or the
undertaking itself was always a product of raving penguin fever.

ewe2, smoking and glowing from the fierce reviewing fire oh yes im a
hot bird now

-- 
Emacs vs. Vi flamewars are a pointless waste of time. Vi is the best