From carolynwhite2 at aol.com  Fri Jun  1 12:11:14 2007
From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (carolynwhite2)
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:11:14 -0000
Subject: ARE WE DONE?!
In-Reply-To: <f3mdlg+6e3b@eGroups.com>
Message-ID: <f3p2d2+9fvt@eGroups.com>

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "quigonginger" 
<quigonginger at ...> wrote:
> 
> To be frank, I have stopped reading the main list.  I'm keeping up 
> with TOC and HH, but HPfGU has gotten too heavy for me.  I was over 
> 600 posts behind when I realized I had another 20 pages of that to 
> read, and I wasn't enjoying it at all.  So I quit.
> 

Go on, spill the beans.. it was that moment when someone said 'Lupus 
means wolf', wasn't it???!

Or don't tell me they have finally gotten around to comparing Rowling 
with Kant...


> 
> All the same, I'm glad to have had this experience and to get to 
know 
> all of you.  Let's all keep in touch, eh?
> 

Likewise. I had an email from Tim Regan saying he thinks it would be 
possible to put the catalogue up as is, so I am going to pursue that 
with him and Paul to see if we can get it done in time for The End.

xxC




From arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com  Fri Jun  1 13:17:23 2007
From: arrowsmithbt at btconnect.com (arrowsmithbt)
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:17:23 -0000
Subject: ARE WE DONE?!
In-Reply-To: <f3p2d2+9fvt@eGroups.com>
Message-ID: <f3p693+3qg6@eGroups.com>

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "carolynwhite2" <carolynwhite2 at ...> wrote:
> 
> Go on, spill the beans.. it was that moment when someone said 'Lupus 
> means wolf', wasn't it???!
> 

I knew there was a clue in there somewhere.
Thank God somebody spotted it.

> Or don't tell me they have finally gotten around to comparing Rowling 
> with Kant...
> 

Kant ... alternative spellings are available....
But no, we're due a no-holds-barred, knock-down, drag-out bunfight
over whether Voldy is a post-modernist re-incarnation of Nietzsche's
'Superman' or JKR is making an allusion to Freud's 'Thanatos' death
instinct from the feminist viewpoint.
It all depends on what DD meant by his 'gleam'.

Kneasy




From annemehr at yahoo.com  Fri Jun  1 16:28:41 2007
From: annemehr at yahoo.com (Annemehr)
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:28:41 -0000
Subject: ARE WE DONE?!
In-Reply-To: <f3man6+2iv8@eGroups.com>
Message-ID: <f3phfp+5b1t@eGroups.com>

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "carolynwhite2" 
<carolynwhite2 at ...> wrote:
 
> 'Now then', she lectures into thin air. 'This seems to be the current 
> situation. There were only five sections listing as to be reviewed, 
> as follows:'
> 
> - 22 Group Dynamics
> - 51 Dumbledore
> - 60 Snape
> - 73 Voldemort
> - 83 Beasts

Hey, Carolyn!

Er, I mean...... hello, Miss.

Let's see... I don't think DD is done. Also, last I recall, Dot was 
going to finish up a few of the beasts, but I don't imagine those 
particular categories are too hairy in any case.

I had recently made a good start in culling some more of the excess out 
of the still distended Harry's Character cat.  I can try to finish that 
up this weekend.

But yeah, let's get this thing out there!  Should I put on clean 
clothes for the opening? *brushes crumbs off shirt*

Anne





From elfundeb at comcast.net  Sun Jun  3 11:59:48 2007
From: elfundeb at comcast.net (Debbie)
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 11:59:48 -0000
Subject: ARE WE DONE?!
In-Reply-To: <f3mjmm+a2kj@eGroups.com>
Message-ID: <f3uafk+6qf2@eGroups.com>

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "Jen Reese" <stevejjen at ...> 
wrote:
>
> Carolyn:
> > I THINK that Snape and Voldemort have now been dealt with
> > (amazingly) by all your sterling efforts, but would like to check 
> > the situation with the other three.
> > 
> > If we have actually reviewed all these sections, we could just 
put 
> > the catalogue up as it stands - a lasting monument to our 
> > collective insanity.
> 
> 
> Jen: Wow, what a concept.  I'm plodding my way through reviewing 
> Snape categories at the moment, still working on the two sub cats 
> Snape & love and LOLLIPOPS.  I'd say when Snape and LV are done 
then 
> it's a go. Whoo-hoo!!  (I can speed it up a little knowing we're 
just 
> trying to get something up.) 

Debbie:
Erm.  I can't seem to get into the catalogue right now.  My computer 
shows a big blank when you get to the "click on who you are" screen.  
But maybe that's my computer at work, since only the old dinosaur has 
any internet access, and it's not working well at the moment.

As for progress, Snape is on re-review.  I don't know how much Jen is 
culling (she may have a much bigger machete than I), but I did not 
remove a great deal from the last subcat I re-reviewed.  So, I'm 
willing to say that if I don't get my internet access fixed 
(something that is very high on my current agenda), we could probably 
live with Snape the way it is.

Aren't we going to have a celebration when we finish?  With the 
finest single-malt whisky and Swiss chocolates?

Debbie
who can't live without cataloguing and will be ready to start 
cataloguing OOP posts in the fall (come to think of it, she'll 
probably be cataloguing DH in the nursing home)




From stevejjen at earthlink.net  Mon Jun  4 16:13:40 2007
From: stevejjen at earthlink.net (Jen Reese)
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:13:40 -0000
Subject: ARE WE DONE?!
In-Reply-To: <f3uafk+6qf2@eGroups.com>
Message-ID: <f41dnk+iumv@eGroups.com>

Debbie:
> As for progress, Snape is on re-review.  I don't know how much Jen is 
> culling (she may have a much bigger machete than I), but I did not 
> remove a great deal from the last subcat I re-reviewed.  So, I'm 
> willing to say that if I don't get my internet access fixed 
> (something that is very high on my current agenda), we could probably 
> live with Snape the way it is.

Jen:  I was just pruning my categories, no machete needed. ;)  I'd say 
it's fine to post as is after everything Debbie did.  More Snape the 
better, right? 


> Aren't we going to have a celebration when we finish?  With the 
> finest single-malt whisky and Swiss chocolates?

Maybe Potioncat will appear and throw one of her parties. ;)

> Debbie
> who can't live without cataloguing and will be ready to start 
> cataloguing OOP posts in the fall (come to think of it, she'll 
> probably be cataloguing DH in the nursing home)

Jen:  Coding is so much more fun; I'd definitely keep going if that's 
the plan.  Any word about Paul wanting to continue on, and Tim? 






From boyd.t.smythe at fritolay.com  Mon Jun  4 16:21:42 2007
From: boyd.t.smythe at fritolay.com (Smythe, Boyd T {FLNA})
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:21:42 -0500
Subject: Are we done?
Message-ID: <F5D89BF3FDEE3241A7CC3835FF61AE2747C269@pepwmu00353.corp.pep.pvt>

Oh my gosh, oh my gosh, oh my gosh!

Nearly done? Nearly done! Yes, DD is nearly done and will be complete by
Friday night. Woohoo!



From annemehr at yahoo.com  Mon Jun  4 23:50:28 2007
From: annemehr at yahoo.com (Annemehr)
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:50:28 -0000
Subject: ARE WE DONE?!
In-Reply-To: <f41dnk+iumv@eGroups.com>
Message-ID: <f428g4+e4sa@eGroups.com>

 
> > Debbie
> > who can't live without cataloguing and will be ready to start 
> > cataloguing OOP posts in the fall (come to think of it, she'll 
> > probably be cataloguing DH in the nursing home)
> 
> Jen:  Coding is so much more fun; I'd definitely keep going if that's 
> the plan.  Any word about Paul wanting to continue on, and Tim?
>

Anne:
Me three - I've actually been looking forward to some nice coding after 
this review's over!




From spotthedungbeetle at hotmail.com  Tue Jun  5 14:41:51 2007
From: spotthedungbeetle at hotmail.com (dungrollin)
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:41:51 -0000
Subject: ARE WE DONE?
In-Reply-To: <F5D89BF3FDEE3241A7CC3835FF61AE2747C269@pepwmu00353.corp.pep.pvt>
Message-ID: <f43snf+aoe9@eGroups.com>

Beasts would be very nearly done if I could get in, but when I reach 
the "please select who you are" page, I don't get any names to choose.

Any tips?

Dot




From carolynwhite2 at aol.com  Tue Jun  5 21:27:25 2007
From: carolynwhite2 at aol.com (carolynwhite2)
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:27:25 -0000
Subject: ARE WE DONE?
In-Reply-To: <f43snf+aoe9@eGroups.com>
Message-ID: <f44kft+rpnt@eGroups.com>

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "dungrollin" 
<spotthedungbeetle at ...> wrote:
>
> Beasts would be very nearly done if I could get in, but when I reach 
> the "please select who you are" page, I don't get any names to choose.
> 
> Any tips?
> 
> Dot
>

Yep, me too! I will get on to Paul and find out what's happened.

Lovely that you all want to go on coding..

Carolyn




From spotthedungbeetle at hotmail.com  Fri Jun  8 14:55:15 2007
From: spotthedungbeetle at hotmail.com (dungrollin)
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:55:15 -0000
Subject: ARE WE DONE?
In-Reply-To: <f44kft+rpnt@eGroups.com>
Message-ID: <f4bqkj+2ctr@eGroups.com>

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "carolynwhite2" 
<carolynwhite2 at ...> wrote:
>
> --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "dungrollin" 
> <spotthedungbeetle@> wrote:
> >
> > Beasts would be very nearly done if I could get in, but when I 
reach 
> > the "please select who you are" page, I don't get any names to 
choose.
> > 
> > Any tips?
> > 
> > Dot
> >
> 
> Yep, me too! I will get on to Paul and find out what's happened.
> 
> Lovely that you all want to go on coding..
> 
> Carolyn
>

Seems to be ok now, hurrah! Will try to get beasts done asap. (BTW, 
thanks, Anne, for helping out.)

Dot







From quigonginger at yahoo.com  Mon Jun 11 08:45:07 2007
From: quigonginger at yahoo.com (quigonginger)
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:45:07 -0000
Subject: LV update
Message-ID: <f4j22j+l9v7@eGroups.com>

Well, I lost all of last weekend due to my stupid computer.  I got an 
accelerator service upgrade I don't know what the heck I'm talking 
about but it's supposed to make it faster.

It really does work, but last weekend was spent figuring out how to 
get it running.  First it wouldn't let me in at all, and then it 
blocked popups, including when we go to view the 40 posts at a time, 
plus it wouldn't let me go from one set of 40 to the next.

But I got it all worked out, and this weekend, with my faster 
connection, I did about 2 weeks worth of work.  It is so much 
faster!  Imagine- it once took about 2-3 minutes to go from finishing 
coding one post until the next one appeared, now it's seconds!  It 
used to take several minutes for those pages of 40 to appear, now 
it's less than 15 seconds!

Anyway, I have 266 posts left to be put in their right spots.  
They've been sorted, so it's just putting them in place.

I should be done within a week.  

One little thing:  I don't need a category for relationship with 
Lily.  All the posts that could go there either fit in the "related 
to" category under family, or the "what happened at GH" category.

Oh, I can't wait to get this finished!  Then summer school and the 
new book, and then another year of school...and internships.  GAAA 
it's all going so fast!

Ginger, who is even typing faster than usual and wonders why.




From quigonginger at yahoo.com  Tue Jun 19 13:25:00 2007
From: quigonginger at yahoo.com (quigonginger)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:25:00 -0000
Subject: LV
Message-ID: <f58lfc+offs@eGroups.com>

LV is done.  Finished.  Over and out.  Completed.  No more.

Let the party begin.

At this point, the only comment I have to make is that the psrt that 
says "powers and plans" is actually housing only posts about his 
powers.  The plans went under agenda.

So, for my next trick, I'm going into that review coding section and 
I'm going to pull out all the posts (at least 100, if memory serves me 
right) that I put in there when I was doing the shipping categories.  
I'll also pull out anything that I know for sure what to do with.  
Everything else I'll leave for those who reviewed them.

Ginger, going to have a lie-down




From ewetoo at gmail.com  Fri Jun 22 01:00:17 2007
From: ewetoo at gmail.com (ewe2)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:00:17 +1000
Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] ARE WE DONE?!
In-Reply-To: <f3man6+2iv8@eGroups.com>
References: <f3man6+2iv8@eGroups.com>
Message-ID: <91d14f320706211800k73fe9156u9367986a00bcd02a@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/31/07, carolynwhite2 <carolynwhite2 at aol.com> wrote:
> The unexpected blast of the tannoy echoes through the catalogue
> office. Slowly, wonderingly the workers lift their heads from
> centuries of slumber. Can it be She who has returned?

Now there's a sequel idea!

> Miss H tidies her desk with one brisk sweep into the paperbin and
> cleans off the blackboard where Kneasy has written some very rude
> words indeed.

Thank god i was in time to scribble them down for posterity ;)

> If we have actually reviewed all these sections, we could just put
> the catalogue up as it stands - a lasting monument to our collective
> insanity.
>
> What say you?

And here I was feeling so guilty to be largely un-nettable and not
contributing, but I am relieved nonetheless - I agree, and also
particularly with Ginger's comment. I am personally over 1100 posts
behind on The List and given the ruthless work we did last year to cut
things down, unless I'm very much mistaken there'll be few and far
between to keep anyway. I suggest a big warning graphic entry to the
catalogue: May Be Contagious If Prone To Feelings Of Analysis!! Very
proud of the work done so far and hope we are showered with gold or
something...

Here's to seeing you all on the smaller lists, I can still read _them_.

very cold (for victoria) penguin

-- 
Emacs vs. Vi flamewars are a pointless waste of time. Vi is the best