<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=MailContainerBody
style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; PADDING-TOP: 15px; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; TEXT-DECORATION: none; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none"
leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 acc_role="text" CanvasTabStop="true"
name="Compose message area"><!--[gte IE 5]><?xml:namespace prefix="v" /><?xml:namespace prefix="o" /><![endif]-->
<DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>From:</B> <A
title=mailto:carolynwhite2@aol.com
href="mailto:carolynwhite2@aol.com">carolynwhite2</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=mailto:HPFGU-Catalogue@yahoogroups.com
href="mailto:HPFGU-Catalogue@yahoogroups.com">HPFGU-Catalogue@yahoogroups.com</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, April 25, 2005 5:58
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: Weasley
Age Gaps</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><TT>
<DIV><BR>--- In <A title=mailto:HPFGU-Catalogue@yahoogroups.com
href="mailto:HPFGU-Catalogue@yahoogroups.com">HPFGU-Catalogue@yahoogroups.com</A>,
"potioncat" <BR><<A title=mailto:willsonkmom@m
href="mailto:willsonkmom@m">willsonkmom@m</A>...> wrote:<BR>> <BR>>
I'm working on the Weasley age gaps which sometimes includes the <BR>>
possible Missing Weasley and/or the Ron is a 7th son Weasley. Most <BR>of
<BR>> these seem to fit better in the Group Dynamics/Weasley family than
<BR>in <BR>> the "how old is______?" catagory. In some cases that would
mean <BR>> adding the code for dynamics.<BR>> <BR>> Thoughts, anyone?
Kathy K., what do you think?<BR>> <BR>> I'm leaning toward the age gap
heading to be about the ages of the <BR>> characters rather than possible
scenarios of what might have been.<BR>> <BR>> More
thoughts?<BR><BR>Carolyn:<BR>Erm, isn't this what I said a few days
ago:<BR><BR>>>In my view, 1.2.12 (calculating character's ages) should
maybe be a<BR>subset of 1.2.10, characterisation, whereas 1.2.12.1 (Weasley
age<BR>gaps) should maybe be a subset of 1.2.11.1 (Weasleys), except
that<BR>would make it a level 5 head. Maybe all of 1.2.12.1 should just
be<BR>folded into 1.2.11.1 and left for KathyK to sort out
<g>...<<<BR><BR><BR><BR>Kathy W.</DIV>
<DIV>Oops, sorry, I was only talking about 1.2.12.1 Weasley age gaps. within
it are how old are Charlie and Bill? And how big is the gap? And why don't
Molly and Arthur have more kids betweenBill&Charlieand Percy.
Is is family planning (or lack thereof) or a dastardly DE attack? With posts
about birth control, infertility, depression...etc., etc.</DIV>
<DIV>;</DIV>
<DIV>I actually thought you were kidding about giving it all to Kathy K.</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>I've marked ones for elimination. Some that are worth keeping might fit
just as well in the dynamics. So, should I cull the list (1.2.12.1)and
let Kathy K consider how the keepers fit with the Weasley code of
1.2.11.1?</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>In re-reading this, I think yes, my review confirms your view that it
would be a subset of Weasleys or possibly even just within Weasleys.</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>KathyW</TT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><!-- |**|end egp html banner|**| --></DIV></BODY></HTML>