<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2668" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=MailContainerBody
style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; PADDING-TOP: 15px; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; TEXT-DECORATION: none; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none"
leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 acc_role="text" CanvasTabStop="true"
name="Compose message area"><!--[gte IE 5]><?xml:namespace prefix="v" /><?xml:namespace prefix="o" /><![endif]-->
<DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><TT>
<DIV><BR><BR><BR><BR>On the other hand, if we get rid of the acronyms, we can
group the<BR>categories thematically like this:<BR><BR>2.5.1 Harry
Potter<BR>2.5.1.0 Character Traits/Maturation<BR>2.5.1.1
Parents/Ancestry<BR>2.5.1.2 Versus LV & DEs<BR>2.5.1.3 Training, Powers,
Protections<BR>2.5.1.4 Harry's Eyes (22 posts)<BR>2.5.1.5 Harry's Scar
(44)<BR>2.5.1.6 Harry's Dreams (43)<BR>2.5.1.7 Stoned!Harry (48)<BR><BR>This
way I think is much easier to view, and it will be quite easy to,<BR>say, add
2.5.1.8 The Prophecy, or any other new category that we might<BR>need.
</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Kathy W.</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Both ideas look good. I vote for the approach above. I think it's
easier/quicker to spot the subject of the post this way. Any client who wanted
to look for TBAY could still use that code. (I'm assuming the TBAY posts would
also have TBAY coded?)</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Great
job!</TT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><!-- |**|end egp html banner|**| --></DIV></BODY></HTML>