The Canon Rule
Doriane
delwynmarch at delwynmarch.yahoo.invalid
Tue Nov 25 10:16:22 UTC 2003
"Jen Reese" said, in post 3 :
> My one pet peeve is posting etiquette: enormous amount of posts on
> the main list that aren't canon-based or where people don't read
> the entire thread and state something that another poster already
> said.
>
> I've always interpreted the canon rule to mean you actually quote
> from the book or an interview with JKR, and base an argument around
> that (but then, I take things very literally <g>). There are quite
> a few posts every day with incorrect quotes, 'guesses' at what the
> canon said b/c the books aren't handy, or even making comments on
> another person's misquote. (Not correcting the mistake, just
> writing about something using the wrong information!)
Er... I post mainly from work (shhhh !), and I can't imagine how I
could possibly have the books here with me. Okay, I *could* have them
in e-book form, but that's nowhere as handy as far as I'm concerned.
So what am I supposed to do ? I try to remember things as correctly
as possible, and when I'm not sure of my facts, I force myself to
wait until I can check at home. But if I had to quote canon each and
every time, I'd pretty much have to stop posting entirely.
Del
More information about the HPFGU-Feedback
archive