From OTC: List-volume discussion (way long)

[dumbledore11214]

> Erin:
> It's true that some members do like to pontificate.  But some of us 
> simply enjoy reading more than others, I suppose.  I can't tell you 
> how many times I've finished one of Elkins' posts and wished that 
she 
> had even *more* to say on a subject.  Sometimes a theory is so good 
> you just don't want it to end!


Alla:


It seems all what I am doing today is saying "me, too" :o)

Elkins' posts are probably the best example of what would have 
happened if the words limit was enforced. I would not be able to read 
Crouch' novella and many other brilliant essays of her. I would 
consider myself to be very deprived then.

 Erin:
 
> As for better logic and more proofreading, those are again more 
> quality than quantity issues, and I don't see how they are to be 
> solved without, say, permanent moderation or some other measure 
more 
> drastic than most members would be willing to support.
> 


Alla:

Absolutely. English is my second language and  no matter how 
carefully I watch myself, I am bound to make some mistakes.

Should I be forbidden from posting because of that?