What Price Success? Improving Posting Quality on HPfGU
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at dumbledore11214.yahoo.invalid
Tue Feb 8 02:58:57 UTC 2005
Barb:
Quotas. Unfortunately it can be tricky to place value judgments of
the posts, but it's easier to apply quotas. I think that in general
anyone who posts more then two posts a day should be placed on
moderation unless the poster has a history of high quality posts.
Alla:
Absolutely, as I said earlier I do understand the quantity control,
even though I like debates very much. Guilty as charged. :)
I vote for a number higher than two posts per day thought ( I can
post three posts per day, but yep on weekeneds my number can be as
high as eight sometimes).
As Susan said though, I can control myself and do less than that, if
I am told that I have to.
In the initial Admin reply they mentioned voluntary limitation for
three posts per day. I'd like to know when it is going to be in
effect and no, I don't think if someone accidentally breaks the
number, they have to be put on moderation. I think it is too harsh.
I think that warning after such violation will be quite sufficient.
Barbs:
It seems to me that we have fewer really good posts. I think there
are still topics that can be discussed, the well is not completely
dry, but then again I was a lit major in college.
Alla:
And I consider myself to be the one who is still learning from the
best writers here, but I definitely learned a lot. I will never be
able to write as well as many english speaking posters, but I don't
think that because of that I should be drastically limited in what I
contribute to the list. Again, I am only speaking against judging
posts on substance.
Even though I speak for myself only, I think that there are some
other posters in the same position as I am.
Barbara Roberts, who believes the best lists are not accidents, but
take a lot of unseen work.
Alla: I agree completely.
More information about the HPFGU-Feedback
archive